457. Are You Measuring Podcast Success All Wrong?
What actually makes podcasting worth it? Downloads, money, recognition, or something else entirely? While our fearless leader, Marc, is out, Ralph Estep Jr. takes the lead as we answer your questions from the mailbag and explore what progress and value really look like in podcasting. From there, we tackle a tough business question: when does it make sense to charge guests to be on your show? We weigh the pros and cons without taking sides. We also dig into cold PR emails and guest pitches, how to spot what’s legit, and what deserves your time. Finally, we explore AI in editing. If your editor is using AI tools behind the scenes, should you care? We unpack trust, cost, and the balance between human skill and automation. If you’re thinking about growth, sustainability, and where this industry is headed, this episode gives you practical insights.
Episode Highlights:
[02:01] Cold outreach podcast promotion offers: spam or legit?
[08:13] When podcasting finally feels worth it and measuring progress beyond downloads
[13:35] Guest pitch emails and PR agents: how to vet and respond
[19:21] Should you charge guests? Reciprocity versus real production costs
[29:59] Turning a podcast appearance into a broader marketing package
[33:29] Should you care if your editor uses AI?
[35:50] AI as a tool: balancing cost, speed, skill, and human oversight
[47:19] Disclosure and regulation: Do you have to say AI was used?
Links & Resources:
The Podcasting Morning Chat:
Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:
www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting
Book A Free Call With Me:
https://calendly.com/ironickmedia/freestrategycall
Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:
www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting
Application To Submit Your Show For Evaluation:
Remember to rate, follow, share, and review our podcast. Your support helps us grow and bring valuable content to the podcasting community.
Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 7 am ET (US) on Clubhouse: https://www.clubhouse.com/house/empowered-podcasting-e6nlrk0w
Live on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@marcronick
Brought to you by iRonickMedia.com
Please note that some links may be affiliate links, which support the hosts of the PMC. Thank you!
--- Send in your mailbag question at: https://www.podpage.com/pmc/contact/ or marc@ironickmedia.com
Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Chat? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:
https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b
00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:05,960
Good morning, podcasting Morning
Chat.
2
00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:10,720
Today is Thursday, February
19th, 2026, and today is our
3
00:00:10,720 --> 00:00:13,520
mailbag edition.
We pulled some real questions
4
00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:16,120
from Facebook and Reddit.
We're going to have questions
5
00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:19,600
about promotion, spam, growth
and motivation, guest pitches,
6
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:22,440
and even some AI editing.
So today's going to be super
7
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:25,160
interactive, so if you're
listening live on Clubhouse, hit
8
00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:27,600
the share button, bottom left
hand side of the screen and
9
00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:29,040
share it.
However, Clubhouse lets you.
10
00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:32,000
And if you're watching us via
podcast, YouTube, LinkedIn,
11
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,600
etcetera, please share this
episode with a fellow past
12
00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,400
podcaster.
And now give me about 30 seconds
13
00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:40,160
and we'll get things rolling.
Thanks for being here today.
14
00:01:20,830 --> 00:01:22,350
Well, good morning again,
podcasting.
15
00:01:22,350 --> 00:01:24,030
Morning, Chad.
Thank you so much for being
16
00:01:24,030 --> 00:01:25,950
here.
I'm your host for today, Ralph E
17
00:01:25,950 --> 00:01:28,510
Step Junior.
And currently on stage with me,
18
00:01:28,510 --> 00:01:33,120
we've got producer Ashley
Feller, Dr. Fay, Jonathan
19
00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:37,040
Howard, Sid Meadows, BC Babbles,
and it looks like Mark has
20
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:39,560
joined us.
So we are ready to roll.
21
00:01:39,960 --> 00:01:41,840
And I just want to thank you for
being here today.
22
00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,920
If you're seeing us live, if you
want to see us live, you can go
23
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:49,760
to our website
thats@podcastingmorningchat.com/join
24
00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:51,440
us.
We just set this up yesterday.
25
00:01:51,440 --> 00:01:53,920
We're ready to go with that.
It's podcasting morning
26
00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:57,800
chat.com/join us.
We're here live on YouTube,
27
00:01:57,800 --> 00:01:59,840
LinkedIn and Facebook.
You can see me rocking the
28
00:01:59,840 --> 00:02:02,520
baseball cap today.
Well, let's jump right into our
29
00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:05,320
first question and we're going
to have our first question.
30
00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:10,639
This one comes from Reddit and I
want everybody to participate
31
00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:13,000
today, so just jump up here.
I'm going to read the question,
32
00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:15,840
then we'll go from there.
So here's a question we got on
33
00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:17,480
Reddit.
Have you had a positive
34
00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:20,360
experience with a cold contact
who offered to promote your
35
00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:23,080
podcast?
We get bombarded with emails and
36
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:26,440
messages every day.
Are they best avoided or can
37
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:29,640
anyone recommend a service
they've experienced personally?
38
00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:32,760
So I thought that was a great
question, Dr., If you want to
39
00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:36,120
jump in, go ahead.
To begin with, let's explain why
40
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:38,520
people are hearing your voice
instead of Marks.
41
00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:42,440
Even though Mark is on stage
with us right now, I know that
42
00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:47,440
he's kind of getting ready for
his procedure.
43
00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:51,760
He's getting his wisdom teeth
taken out today and we just
44
00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:55,120
wanted to take one thing off of
his plate that he had to worry
45
00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:58,000
about, which is hosting this
show.
46
00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:00,640
That's why you hear Ralph's
voice.
47
00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:06,640
Anyway, these emails, these spam
emails are the bane of my
48
00:03:06,640 --> 00:03:09,680
existence.
I have a client who gets them
49
00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:13,080
all the time.
And when she gets them, she
50
00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:17,040
forwards them to me and says,
are we doing this?
51
00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:18,440
Should we be doing this and
that?
52
00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:22,680
And she's pointing out things in
the in the e-mail and I have to
53
00:03:22,680 --> 00:03:25,920
e-mail her back every time and
say, oh, I'm sorry, I thought
54
00:03:25,920 --> 00:03:31,240
that we already discussed this.
We are actually doing everything
55
00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:33,920
that can be done for your
podcast.
56
00:03:33,920 --> 00:03:36,360
And the reason why you're
getting these every day because
57
00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:38,000
she complained that she was
getting them every day.
58
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:40,480
The reason why you're getting
these every day is because
59
00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:44,920
they're spam.
So rest assured that my team is
60
00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:47,520
working for you very hard, very
diligently.
61
00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:50,120
They're very, very capable.
They know what they're doing.
62
00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:55,400
And I just have to stand firm in
that.
63
00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:59,600
Not to be too woo woo, but
standing firm in my truth, gosh
64
00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:02,040
darn it.
Thank you, Dr. That's a very
65
00:04:02,040 --> 00:04:03,760
good point.
Yeah, I get them as well.
66
00:04:04,040 --> 00:04:06,560
Has anybody ever actually used
one of those services?
67
00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:08,480
That's another thing we can talk
about, but I know some other
68
00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:10,800
people had flashed their
interest in talking.
69
00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:12,440
So go ahead and jump up there,
if you will.
70
00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:15,960
I will jump in and say, much
like Dr. What I would recommend
71
00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:19,720
for anybody that's looking to
promote their podcast is to find
72
00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:23,200
somebody that they've worked
with that they're aware of, that
73
00:04:23,280 --> 00:04:29,320
a friend can recommend that does
a larger kind of promotional
74
00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:32,600
thing with on social media,
wherever they want to be
75
00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:34,080
promoted.
Like if they want to do ads,
76
00:04:34,280 --> 00:04:35,760
find somebody who's really good
at ads.
77
00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:39,640
But a lot of those spam emails
and a lot of those concepts of
78
00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:43,040
what they're doing to promote
shows aren't complete.
79
00:04:43,280 --> 00:04:47,120
They don't really help you get
where you want to go with these
80
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:48,960
things.
So really just for finding
81
00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:53,400
somebody who does marketing to
help you promote your show
82
00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:57,080
because you really need a full
complement of services doing
83
00:04:57,280 --> 00:05:00,040
that sort of thing.
BC go ahead, I said you had a
84
00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:01,760
comment.
I think every single time I get
85
00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:05,080
one of those requests, usually
through LinkedIn and sometimes
86
00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:08,000
through Instagram, I look at the
person or the account I should
87
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:10,800
say that sent the request and
they always have like 0
88
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:12,880
connections.
They have zero network and I'm
89
00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:14,800
like there's no way I'm talking
to this person.
90
00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:17,480
I don't know about everyone
else, but every single one,
91
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:20,760
every single solicitation I get,
it does not look like a real
92
00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:23,160
person.
So I'm just never even
93
00:05:23,160 --> 00:05:25,320
responding to those anymore.
Very good point.
94
00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:27,640
Anybody else wanted to have an
idea?
95
00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:29,720
Here, I'll jump in.
Good morning everybody.
96
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:33,600
I get most of these via e-mail
to go into my spam box and I
97
00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:35,640
just delete them.
I don't have the bandwidth for
98
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:38,040
that, right?
I'm kind of like Dr. But the
99
00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,560
ones I get on LinkedIn to BCS
point, I don't even get a
100
00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:44,040
message from them.
I just get a connection request.
101
00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:49,440
And I bet I have 20 podcast
promoter connection requests in
102
00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:51,640
my LinkedIn and I just ignore
them.
103
00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:55,000
Like I'm just not because I know
immediately when I accept them
104
00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:57,600
I'm going to start getting spam
about it.
105
00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,800
So I think the best path is just
to ignore them.
106
00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:03,600
But I had a follow up question
for Jonathan if I could for a
107
00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:04,840
second.
Sure.
108
00:06:04,840 --> 00:06:07,400
And I don't want to take us down
a rabbit hole and take us away
109
00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:09,720
from the mailbag.
But Jonathan, you're talking
110
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:11,800
about marketing and finding
someone that's an expert in
111
00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:15,480
marketing or that you know, my
question is how much marketing
112
00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:18,640
is too much of your podcast?
I think you need to be present
113
00:06:18,640 --> 00:06:20,160
on social.
You need to be putting out
114
00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:22,400
whatever platforms you're active
on.
115
00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:26,560
I have an Instagram and I
promote some of my podcasts on
116
00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:30,400
LinkedIn and stuff like that.
It depends honestly, and I think
117
00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:33,200
it depends for everybody.
How what do you want to reach?
118
00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:37,200
Are your people on social media
or are you looking for it?
119
00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:39,880
Like in your case, are your
people that are listening to
120
00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:43,200
your podcast on social media or
do you have another Ave. that's
121
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:44,400
going to be better to reach
them?
122
00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:47,200
When it comes to social media,
it depends on if your people are
123
00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:49,840
there and if you're reaching
them, and what you want to get
124
00:06:49,840 --> 00:06:53,080
out of your show each week or
whenever you're publishing it.
125
00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:55,960
So I was kind of going to kind
of further breakdown what
126
00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:57,920
Jonathan was saying about
audience.
127
00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:00,240
Like for instance, if you have
like a lifestyle podcast, you
128
00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,760
know, you're probably going to
aim to be on Instagram, TikTok a
129
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:06,480
lot.
Or if you have a more business
130
00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:08,520
focused podcast, you might just
be on LinkedIn.
131
00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:10,560
So just further expanding on
that.
132
00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:14,200
It really depends on the topic,
your format, you know, whether
133
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:18,160
or not you're pushing weekly, bi
weekly, monthly.
134
00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,760
All those things are going to
dictate what is your base level
135
00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:25,280
for social media versus what may
or may not be considered too
136
00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:28,000
much.
Because if you're doing a fair
137
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:31,200
frequency, you can probably milk
a single episode for quite a bit
138
00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:32,880
of content.
I think that's a really good
139
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:35,000
point.
I would just say also what
140
00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:38,360
platform you actually like to
create on is another thing that
141
00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:41,800
comes into play because those
are the ones that you're going
142
00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:44,440
to actually enjoy creating
content and promote.
143
00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:45,720
I think it's a really good
point.
144
00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:47,680
And I, I think, you know, big
take away here is just be
145
00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:50,560
careful because I've seen these
things where people say, oh, I'm
146
00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:53,080
going to guarantee a certain
number downloads.
147
00:07:53,080 --> 00:07:55,520
I'm going to guarantee you're
going to get, you know, these
148
00:07:55,520 --> 00:07:57,120
things.
So what are some red flags that
149
00:07:57,120 --> 00:07:58,200
people should be watching out
for?
150
00:07:58,200 --> 00:08:00,880
Does anyone want to comment on
some red flag things they we
151
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,040
should be careful of?
Yeah, if they make promises,
152
00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:05,200
yeah.
I, I tend to agree with you
153
00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:07,400
there, Jonathan.
I think that's 100% accurate.
154
00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:09,840
We hear people say, well, I'm
going to guarantee a certain
155
00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:12,400
number of downloads as soon as I
hear that you got to be
156
00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:14,840
suspicious.
Well, let's move on to our
157
00:08:14,840 --> 00:08:17,280
second question, if everybody's
cool with that one.
158
00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:20,200
This is another one that comes
from Reddit.
159
00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:22,680
And I, when I read this
question, I was like, man, this
160
00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:24,440
is perfect.
And it says, at what point did
161
00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:26,840
podcasting start to feel worth
it for you?
162
00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:29,920
Was it downloads?
Was it messages from listeners
163
00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:33,120
or did it just really click and
you just kept going anyway?
164
00:08:33,799 --> 00:08:36,880
And generally interested in how
others measure progress.
165
00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:38,919
So I thought that was a really
great question.
166
00:08:38,919 --> 00:08:40,960
Somebody was really putting
their heart out there asking
167
00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:45,080
that question, How do we measure
progress without burning out?
168
00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:46,640
You know, what counts is worth
it.
169
00:08:46,640 --> 00:08:48,840
Does anybody want to comment on
that?
170
00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:50,280
You know what has been worth it
for you?
171
00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:52,320
What counts as progress free?
Go ahead, Ashley.
172
00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:56,840
I would say when it became my
new career, because before I
173
00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:01,440
became a podcast producer, I was
a professional musician.
174
00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:05,080
I've been a teacher, I've worked
in mental health facilities.
175
00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:09,920
I've had many different careers.
And I did my own podcast for a
176
00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:12,000
couple of years.
And then after a couple of years
177
00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:16,640
in, I started getting, you know,
emails and messages from people
178
00:09:16,640 --> 00:09:19,960
saying, hey, you do a really
great job on your own podcast.
179
00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:22,960
Have you ever considered doing
that for other people?
180
00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:27,200
And it wasn't too long after
that I got my first client and
181
00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,280
continued to do so.
So the career shift is when it
182
00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:33,600
became worth it.
Go ahead DRSC, you had a comment
183
00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:36,160
to make.
I think it is a multitude of
184
00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:39,720
things.
Downloads is just a little part
185
00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:44,440
of it, but engagement probably
my client roster.
186
00:09:44,680 --> 00:09:49,120
So it's everything all mixed up
into one, but especially
187
00:09:49,120 --> 00:09:51,520
engagement has to go at the top
of my list I think.
188
00:09:51,920 --> 00:09:53,640
And I think that's brilliant.
I mean, I think that's the whole
189
00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:54,880
point.
I mean, you can get stuck on
190
00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,400
downloads and make yourself
really feel bad about yourself,
191
00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:00,280
but you can have a a small
number of downloads and really
192
00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:02,440
have a significantly engaging
program.
193
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:04,280
BCI.
See, you wanted to comment and
194
00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:09,480
then we'll go to Jonathan Sid.
It's when your capacity for have
195
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:12,440
a building that can be focused
toward building something new
196
00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:16,080
and exciting for people or
community lines up with your
197
00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:18,640
capacity to be consistent.
We I think we talked a lot of
198
00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:22,160
time and podcasting consistency
amongst the many elements that
199
00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:25,840
can create something new and
successful is one of the biggest
200
00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:27,680
elements.
So I think when those particular
201
00:10:27,680 --> 00:10:31,120
things lined up like for me
building up my sub stack and how
202
00:10:31,120 --> 00:10:34,600
consistent I did with that sense
before the Thanksgiving holiday
203
00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:38,280
and I'm seeing for from that
Ave. alone because of the
204
00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:42,000
consistency, see more engagement
that I've seen in other
205
00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:44,480
platforms where I've not been
able to maintain similar
206
00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:47,840
consistency is just to me is is
great.
207
00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:51,520
So I I realized that those
things like lining up really
208
00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:55,320
showcase a great platform for
success and and development.
209
00:10:55,680 --> 00:10:57,920
For me, it's the moment that
somebody that I don't have
210
00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:01,400
direct contact with thanks me
for something that they got out
211
00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:03,360
of the podcast.
It's that simple.
212
00:11:03,560 --> 00:11:05,560
Yeah, I do agree with what
everybody's saying, especially
213
00:11:05,560 --> 00:11:09,120
what Jonathan just said.
But for me, the moment was in
214
00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:12,720
2021.
I was at a big furniture event
215
00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:18,480
and I got stopped in the hallway
three times within about 10
216
00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:21,680
minutes.
People recognizing me and asking
217
00:11:21,680 --> 00:11:24,400
me if I was Sid and blah, blah,
blah and thanking me for the
218
00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:26,600
show.
It just like was a very humbling
219
00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:29,040
experience to be recognized like
that.
220
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:32,480
And it was one of those that
like, wow, this really is
221
00:11:32,480 --> 00:11:34,440
working.
This is really has impact and
222
00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:37,240
people really listening.
And so for me, that was the
223
00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:41,200
moment when I got stopped in a
hallway by random strangers.
224
00:11:41,560 --> 00:11:44,400
Yeah, that's beautiful.
I see Nikki's join us on stage.
225
00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:47,960
Nikki, did you want to comment?
As a a fairly new podcaster,
226
00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:49,440
I've been doing it for four
months.
227
00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:52,040
I definitely echo everything
that everyone said.
228
00:11:52,040 --> 00:11:55,320
I feel the exact same way.
I did receive a message from
229
00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:57,680
someone the other day.
He came on my show and and he
230
00:11:57,680 --> 00:12:00,000
said he goes.
I just wanted to take a moment
231
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:02,680
to say thank you for everything.
Thank you for having me on the
232
00:12:02,680 --> 00:12:04,600
Gentle Year.
You made me feel completely at
233
00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:07,040
ease and your questions showed
me that you genuinely care about
234
00:12:07,040 --> 00:12:09,600
the families listening.
That's not something that every
235
00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:12,760
host brings to the table and I
noticed it from our very first
236
00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:15,600
conversation, the pre interview.
You have a real gift for
237
00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:18,240
creating space where people can
be honest and I'm grateful I got
238
00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:20,760
to be a part of it.
I also want to thank you for all
239
00:12:20,760 --> 00:12:22,720
the hard work you've been
putting into my project.
240
00:12:22,720 --> 00:12:25,240
So this relationship that we
had, it just kind of happened
241
00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:27,560
organically and we're working on
other things outside of the
242
00:12:27,560 --> 00:12:29,800
project.
And he goes and you didn't have
243
00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:32,720
to go above and beyond the way
you have it and it hasn't gone
244
00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:34,320
unnoticed.
Your time, effort, and your
245
00:12:34,320 --> 00:12:36,840
willingness to dig in and help
it all means more to me that I
246
00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:39,680
can put in that I can properly
put into words.
247
00:12:39,920 --> 00:12:41,680
And I don't take any of that for
granted.
248
00:12:41,680 --> 00:12:44,160
I left you a 5 star review
because I meant every word of
249
00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:46,080
it.
So those kinds of things and my
250
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:48,680
Facebook community, all the
different things, it definitely
251
00:12:48,680 --> 00:12:51,320
keeps me going because my
schedule is very busy and
252
00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:53,440
sometimes I just don't.
I feel like I don't have the
253
00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:55,200
energy.
But when I look at things like
254
00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:57,680
that, it definitely keeps me
pushing a lot.
255
00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:01,360
I want to ask what did you do to
go above and beyond?
256
00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:06,680
So the guy who came on my
podcast, he has dyslexia and he
257
00:13:06,680 --> 00:13:12,040
has a really hard time, but he
knows how to build programs and
258
00:13:12,040 --> 00:13:16,800
teach people how to teach others
who have dyslexia how to read
259
00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:19,680
really well, which is typically
their biggest challenge.
260
00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:22,520
I'm a teacher, so I work with
kids all the time, and I've got
261
00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:25,000
some neurodivergent learners and
things of that nature.
262
00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:27,880
And so I'm kind of helping him
understand how to present this
263
00:13:27,880 --> 00:13:31,720
information from a teacher's
perspective so that he can get
264
00:13:31,720 --> 00:13:33,880
his programs into schools and
things like that.
265
00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:37,200
That's really great.
OK, well let's move on to our
266
00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:40,800
third question for today.
This one is also from Reddit and
267
00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:44,560
this message is guest emailing
me to be on the podcast.
268
00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:47,840
I'm getting emails from agents
wanting to introduce people to
269
00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:51,560
come to or be in my podcast.
This the first time I'm getting
270
00:13:51,560 --> 00:13:54,640
them, which is nice, but some
are definitely not guest for my
271
00:13:54,640 --> 00:13:57,120
target audience.
It's nice to know that my
272
00:13:57,120 --> 00:13:59,960
podcast is coming up on whatever
database they're getting it
273
00:13:59,960 --> 00:14:03,120
from, but I really want to know
what should I do about this?
274
00:14:03,120 --> 00:14:05,520
And I, I'll be honest with you,
I, when I, when I was looking at
275
00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:07,480
looking at this question, I went
back and looked at my e-mail.
276
00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:09,640
I'll probably get about seven or
eight of these a day.
277
00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:12,680
And The funny thing is, I don't
have guests on my show.
278
00:14:12,680 --> 00:14:15,160
So this was an interesting
situation.
279
00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:17,960
Does anybody else want to
comment on that and give the
280
00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:20,480
some guidance here?
For quick revocation, are these
281
00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:24,880
agents who represent a singular
person trying to get their
282
00:14:24,880 --> 00:14:27,080
personal exposure by getting
them onto a podcast?
283
00:14:27,080 --> 00:14:31,360
Or is this someone offering like
a find you guests kind of
284
00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:33,800
service?
I don't know the answer to that
285
00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:37,680
because it doesn't say that, but
I'm going to make an assumption
286
00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:39,720
because, you know, assumptions
are always good to do, right?
287
00:14:39,960 --> 00:14:43,200
We'll make an assumption that
that is an agent trying to get a
288
00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:44,880
singular guest.
I'm, I'm going to speak from
289
00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:47,240
personal experience, like I've
gotten a bunch of those lately
290
00:14:47,520 --> 00:14:49,800
where it'll be a certain person.
You should really have this
291
00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:52,160
person on your show.
This person is XY and Z.
292
00:14:52,160 --> 00:14:54,000
And I, I think I understand the
other side of that.
293
00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:58,120
And that's because these folks
are paying these agents to go
294
00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:00,840
get them booked on shows.
Does that help you with that?
295
00:15:01,160 --> 00:15:03,760
Yeah, absolutely.
And I would say based on that, I
296
00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:07,840
would say for this person, you
know, if it's really should be
297
00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:11,320
on the agent to do plenty of
research on who you are and to
298
00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:14,640
properly determine if their
person will match up to your
299
00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:16,160
audience.
And granted, assuming that
300
00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:20,160
you've built your platforms up
to properly reflect your voice,
301
00:15:20,160 --> 00:15:23,880
your focus, your format, so that
there should be no question
302
00:15:23,880 --> 00:15:27,040
about that.
I would just say anytime those
303
00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:29,800
agents reach out and you, that
person that they're trying to
304
00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:33,400
Rep is not a great fit.
Let them know, hey, I appreciate
305
00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:34,560
it.
This doesn't seem like the best
306
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:36,480
fit.
I wish you luck in finding some
307
00:15:36,480 --> 00:15:39,360
other platform or podcast for
this person, but this won't be
308
00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:41,560
it for me basically.
How about Ashley?
309
00:15:41,560 --> 00:15:42,920
Ashley, did you want to make a
comment?
310
00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:47,760
I was going to say the same
thing as BC and I also that this
311
00:15:47,760 --> 00:15:50,280
kind of reminds me of the first
question we have where there's
312
00:15:50,280 --> 00:15:54,200
there's folks out there, you
know, legit some legit some not
313
00:15:54,520 --> 00:15:58,720
who just for lack of a better
word, just send out mass emails
314
00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:01,480
to as many people they find out
have a podcast as well.
315
00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:03,160
And I think Sid's got something
to say.
316
00:16:03,640 --> 00:16:05,240
Yeah, I'm happy to jump in.
Thank you, Ashley.
317
00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:08,880
I get these a lot and most of
them I don't do anything with,
318
00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:13,480
but occasionally I always read
them because you never know if
319
00:16:13,480 --> 00:16:16,560
the guest is going to be
somebody for me that will fit my
320
00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:18,880
show because I do have an
interview show or at least two
321
00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:20,720
segments a month that are
interviews.
322
00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:24,640
And so I do read them and I've
been fortunate enough to, I
323
00:16:24,640 --> 00:16:27,760
think get 3 or 4 guests from
these PR consultants.
324
00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:32,080
That's what they're being paid
to do, is to get this person on
325
00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:35,240
the appropriate shows.
And so I have two coming up that
326
00:16:35,240 --> 00:16:38,440
are and one last year and then
one coming up in a couple of
327
00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:43,480
weeks that is from the same PR
agency out of London that knows
328
00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:45,200
my show and has brought me a
couple of people.
329
00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:48,800
So I do read them.
I look, if the person is, you
330
00:16:48,800 --> 00:16:51,360
know, suitable for my show, if
they're within our industry or
331
00:16:51,360 --> 00:16:54,560
can share something that's going
to impact, if I am interested, I
332
00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:57,920
schedule a pre call with them
and then decide if I think
333
00:16:57,920 --> 00:16:59,520
they're going to be a good guest
or not.
334
00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:02,520
I do pay attention to them and
I've had limited success with
335
00:17:02,520 --> 00:17:03,160
them.
Yeah.
336
00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:04,400
Dr. Do you have a question for
me?
337
00:17:04,800 --> 00:17:09,640
I think we have to make a
comparison between all of these
338
00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:12,960
things that are popping up like
want to guest, meet a guest or
339
00:17:13,280 --> 00:17:16,560
want to get to be a guest.
I mean, these Facebook groups,
340
00:17:16,839 --> 00:17:19,960
you can easily go on these
Facebook groups.
341
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:24,599
And if you're someone who's
looking to be on a podcast, then
342
00:17:24,599 --> 00:17:26,880
these Facebook groups are
amazing.
343
00:17:27,319 --> 00:17:33,520
And I don't know what the
professional PR person who is
344
00:17:33,760 --> 00:17:39,160
you're paying to get on to
podcasts and these groups on
345
00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:43,920
Facebook, what the big
difference is, but except for
346
00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:48,840
the cost, of course.
I know one of these PR people
347
00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:54,960
that makes 6 figures in placing
people on podcasts.
348
00:17:55,360 --> 00:17:58,040
It's amazing.
If you can, you can get it that
349
00:17:58,040 --> 00:18:01,440
way, but there's less expensive
ways to get on podcasts.
350
00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:03,040
Just don't forget about Pod
match either.
351
00:18:03,040 --> 00:18:05,000
Pod match is a great tool.
I do not subscribe.
352
00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:06,640
To pod match, Yeah, pod match
it.
353
00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:10,720
Is a great tool, right?
But for me, my show is so niche
354
00:18:11,200 --> 00:18:15,040
that I am looking for very
particular type of people that
355
00:18:15,040 --> 00:18:20,160
work within the industry.
And it's very rare that I get PR
356
00:18:20,160 --> 00:18:23,680
firms out reaching to me that
are in the industry.
357
00:18:23,680 --> 00:18:26,200
So that's for me what I'm always
looking for is it a fit.
358
00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:28,640
And I've been fortunate enough
to get 3 or 4 of them that do,
359
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:32,280
which is great.
But I mean these guys get paid
360
00:18:32,280 --> 00:18:36,760
by the guest to help promote
their brand and to help expand
361
00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:39,160
their reach, get them on shows
and other things.
362
00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:42,640
This is some of this leads to
speaking and books and all kinds
363
00:18:42,640 --> 00:18:45,400
of other things.
So it's all tied in and it, it,
364
00:18:45,440 --> 00:18:47,760
I mean, I've talked to several
of these people and they're
365
00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:50,040
really, you know, the ones I've
talked to have been really nice
366
00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:52,480
and do great work.
And so I think you just have to
367
00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:55,600
pay attention to, you know,
investigate the firm that's
368
00:18:55,600 --> 00:18:57,040
reaching us.
Are they a real firm?
369
00:18:57,040 --> 00:18:59,480
I mean, I always go to their
website to look, even before I
370
00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:01,960
remove it from my spam.
I investigate the person.
371
00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:05,520
I go to their LinkedIn profile,
I go to their Instagram if they
372
00:19:05,520 --> 00:19:08,200
have one.
And so I do my homework before I
373
00:19:08,200 --> 00:19:10,840
ever respond.
And then when I respond, I say,
374
00:19:10,840 --> 00:19:13,920
Hey, I think that and I only
respond to the ones that are, I
375
00:19:13,920 --> 00:19:16,480
believe a match.
And so that's when I just say I
376
00:19:16,480 --> 00:19:18,280
think this is a potentially good
match.
377
00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:21,160
Let's set up a call.
Here's a link, set up a call.
378
00:19:21,360 --> 00:19:23,040
However, I'm going to just add
to this.
379
00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:28,840
I am evaluating charging these
people a fee, a production fee
380
00:19:28,840 --> 00:19:30,600
to be on my show.
I haven't gotten there yet, but
381
00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:34,760
I am evaluating that because it
is quite a bit of work to bring
382
00:19:34,760 --> 00:19:37,720
a guest on, especially one that
you don't go and find yourself.
383
00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:40,520
You might spend a lot of time
finding guests and the right
384
00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:43,760
guests for my show, so I'm
currently evaluating whether or
385
00:19:43,760 --> 00:19:47,080
not I'm going to charge the
firms for people to be a guest.
386
00:19:47,600 --> 00:19:49,880
Let's unpack that just for a
second, OK?
387
00:19:49,880 --> 00:19:57,480
Psychiatrist Dr. has come out.
And I know that there's someone
388
00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:01,200
that Mark has interviewed that
practices this way.
389
00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:04,720
I forgot who it was.
It wasn't Heather Purse it.
390
00:20:04,720 --> 00:20:07,000
Was a lady.
I remember the conversation, but
391
00:20:07,000 --> 00:20:08,320
I don't remember her name
either.
392
00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:12,560
And I still have.
I'm still reluctant to do this.
393
00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:18,320
I feel like it is very
reciprocity kind of thing that
394
00:20:18,400 --> 00:20:22,200
you know your guest is coming on
and giving value to your
395
00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:27,720
listeners and in return you're
giving them a platform to
396
00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:31,800
promote themselves.
It's kind of an even exchange
397
00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:37,880
and I just, I just do not feel
good about charging people to be
398
00:20:37,880 --> 00:20:40,280
on a show.
Go ahead BC, I see you had a
399
00:20:40,280 --> 00:20:41,920
comment.
Not to interrupt you Dr., but I
400
00:20:41,920 --> 00:20:44,160
see BC had a comment and
Jonathan had a comment as well.
401
00:20:44,400 --> 00:20:45,960
Yeah, DRI feel the same way for
sure.
402
00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:47,680
There's a great inherent
reciprocity.
403
00:20:47,680 --> 00:20:52,040
You know, you're getting a
potentially cool person who has
404
00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:54,920
a solid following onto your
show, which cross promotes that
405
00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:57,880
and you're providing them a free
promotion and that provides that
406
00:20:57,880 --> 00:21:00,360
cross promotion there.
Now I will say regarding
407
00:21:00,360 --> 00:21:03,760
charging people, you know, I
will collab with them on social
408
00:21:03,760 --> 00:21:05,880
media.
I will tag them with the few
409
00:21:05,880 --> 00:21:08,560
reels that I make per episode to
push the episode.
410
00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:12,160
But I do like to say in the
discovery call that I have
411
00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:14,520
before the actual recording
session.
412
00:21:14,880 --> 00:21:18,280
If you at any point would like
to Commission me to create more
413
00:21:18,280 --> 00:21:23,240
reels for your own use your own
self promotion in the future.
414
00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:25,880
Saying that hey, further
establish your thought
415
00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:28,440
leadership with these interview
clips you did.
416
00:21:28,760 --> 00:21:32,440
Then I got a rate sheets, I'll
send it to you.
417
00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,840
You can Commission me and then
that's where any kind of charger
418
00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:37,440
comes in.
But yeah, I'm, I'm with Dr. on
419
00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:40,640
the whole and here in
reciprocity part of just being
420
00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:43,360
on the show, there's cross
promotion there inherently.
421
00:21:43,360 --> 00:21:47,680
So I take that.
Yeah, reciprocity is good.
422
00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:52,640
But sometimes what you offer in
your show, based on what you put
423
00:21:52,640 --> 00:21:56,120
together, your audience, how
much time it takes for you to do
424
00:21:56,120 --> 00:22:00,000
this, it it's worth payment.
And if people are willing to
425
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:02,880
pay, I don't see anything wrong
with it.
426
00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:06,840
And I understand what you guys
are saying, but sometimes it's
427
00:22:06,840 --> 00:22:10,600
not an equal balance there.
Maybe for some people it it's
428
00:22:10,600 --> 00:22:14,800
worth it to have a payment
option because your value is
429
00:22:14,800 --> 00:22:18,200
what you you know what you
determine it to be, not what
430
00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:19,560
somebody else determines it to
be.
431
00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:21,440
Yeah, I agree.
And Janae put in the comments
432
00:22:21,440 --> 00:22:23,960
that I've charged a few times to
guests on my show.
433
00:22:24,280 --> 00:22:26,320
So I it's not it's not an
unheard of thing.
434
00:22:26,320 --> 00:22:29,640
I know I'm on Pod match and one
of the things that Podmatch is
435
00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:32,840
doing now, which I kind of
appreciate is they actually have
436
00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:37,120
a field on there that says, hey,
you, we are charging a fee to
437
00:22:37,120 --> 00:22:38,840
guest on the show.
And I don't like that.
438
00:22:38,840 --> 00:22:42,200
Now the other day I had one
where a situation was that
439
00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:43,880
wasn't let, wasn't said like
that.
440
00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:46,280
And then the person sent me,
hey, I'd really like to have you
441
00:22:46,280 --> 00:22:49,040
on my show.
And then they sent me a Google
442
00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:50,320
document.
And all the way at the bottom of
443
00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:53,640
the Google document is how would
you like to pay for your guest
444
00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:55,480
on my show?
And he had three or four
445
00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:58,360
different sponsorship
opportunities.
446
00:22:58,840 --> 00:23:00,440
And I sort of reached out back
to him.
447
00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:02,200
I said, wait a second guy.
I said, you said you don't
448
00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:03,560
charge for your show.
He goes, why don't charge?
449
00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:06,120
That's that's optional.
I said, well, it sure doesn't
450
00:23:06,120 --> 00:23:08,600
feel optional.
And I just want to bring up
451
00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:10,440
something that Tim put in the
comments too.
452
00:23:10,440 --> 00:23:12,480
When we're talking about these
guest emails.
453
00:23:13,200 --> 00:23:17,400
If it starts off with, I hope
this message finds you well or
454
00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:21,040
one of those AI things, I'll
take, I just zone it out.
455
00:23:21,480 --> 00:23:24,520
So if that's one of the things
that that other people are
456
00:23:24,520 --> 00:23:26,880
feeling with at the same time.
But I understand what
457
00:23:26,880 --> 00:23:28,840
everybody's saying.
I mean, there is, I agree with
458
00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:32,040
Sid, there's a cost to this, but
I agree with DR2.
459
00:23:32,040 --> 00:23:34,200
There's this balance of
reciprocity.
460
00:23:34,200 --> 00:23:36,440
It's a tough call.
It really is a tough call.
461
00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:37,880
Does anybody else want to
comment?
462
00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:39,920
Yeah, I want to jump in.
Janae's coming up.
463
00:23:39,920 --> 00:23:42,080
He can talk about this too, but
I want you to think about
464
00:23:42,080 --> 00:23:43,760
something else.
So somebody's coming onto your
465
00:23:43,760 --> 00:23:44,560
show.
They're they're coming up.
466
00:23:44,560 --> 00:23:47,800
They're looking to be on shows
for a reason, and a lot of times
467
00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:51,000
it's maybe to sell something.
And when you think about the
468
00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:54,720
power of your audience and your
audience taking action.
469
00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:57,800
If I have somebody, let's just
say I have a consultant come on
470
00:23:57,800 --> 00:24:01,280
my show and I'll use the Yard
example, I have Yard come on my
471
00:24:01,320 --> 00:24:04,440
show to talk about the power of
podcasting and how it can help
472
00:24:04,440 --> 00:24:08,400
grow your brand, which can
result in growing your revenue
473
00:24:08,440 --> 00:24:12,280
and selling more furniture.
That's a very viable
474
00:24:12,280 --> 00:24:15,880
conversation for me to have with
my audience is they look to
475
00:24:15,880 --> 00:24:18,400
expand their presence and to get
more sales.
476
00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:22,000
Dr. gets a couple of sales and
she's off to the races.
477
00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:24,200
What did Sid get?
I mean, I didn't really get
478
00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:26,280
anything out of it other than I
got a guess out of it, a really
479
00:24:26,280 --> 00:24:28,720
good guess.
But my audience went and engaged
480
00:24:28,720 --> 00:24:32,600
with Dr. and hired Dr. or maybe
bought a product that somebody
481
00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:36,400
was selling or signed up to be a
dealer for that product, right?
482
00:24:36,680 --> 00:24:39,880
And so the values, not just in
being on my show, the values in
483
00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:42,760
my audience taking action and
signing up.
484
00:24:42,760 --> 00:24:47,400
So you got something out of it.
I believe I should also get
485
00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:49,600
something out of it.
Producing a podcast is not
486
00:24:49,600 --> 00:24:51,560
inexpensive.
It costs quite a bit of money
487
00:24:51,560 --> 00:24:53,080
and we put a lot of work into
it.
488
00:24:53,080 --> 00:24:56,520
So don't devalue.
I'm not saying I'm doing it, but
489
00:24:56,520 --> 00:25:00,320
what I am saying is don't
devalue yourself or your
490
00:25:00,360 --> 00:25:04,760
ecosystem of your people, the
followers, in their ability to
491
00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:08,080
take action and to help that
person succeed financially.
492
00:25:08,680 --> 00:25:12,200
That's where you can set up, you
know, to get a little cha ching
493
00:25:12,600 --> 00:25:14,680
on the side when they click on
the link.
494
00:25:15,240 --> 00:25:18,680
You know, as an affiliate, you
can set up an affiliate program
495
00:25:18,680 --> 00:25:22,200
before they they come on your on
your show and talk about you can
496
00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:24,680
you're not wrong.
You're not wrong, but I'm not
497
00:25:24,680 --> 00:25:27,200
interested in a $25 payment
because somebody bought your
498
00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:29,080
service.
I'm not interested in that so.
499
00:25:29,120 --> 00:25:31,040
But you also asked, what do you
get?
500
00:25:31,040 --> 00:25:36,000
You get the reputation of, you
know, Sid's show is amazing.
501
00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:38,280
Do you know who we had on the on
the show the other day?
502
00:25:38,520 --> 00:25:43,040
That's what you get also.
You're not wrong at all, Doctor
503
00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:46,120
DRI.
Want to go to Janae here in a
504
00:25:46,120 --> 00:25:48,200
second, but I want to read
something that Dave put in the
505
00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:50,280
comments, which I think we
really should look at here.
506
00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:53,280
And it says some of my guests
were shocked at the podcaster
507
00:25:53,280 --> 00:25:56,480
wasn't paid by their PR company.
The guests thought their fee
508
00:25:56,480 --> 00:25:58,200
included money to the show as
well.
509
00:25:58,200 --> 00:26:00,000
And I think that's an
interesting point as well.
510
00:26:00,360 --> 00:26:01,520
So Dave, thanks for sharing
that.
511
00:26:01,520 --> 00:26:03,200
But Janae, go ahead.
You wanted to make a comment.
512
00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:07,280
This is an excellent topic.
And if you think about it, the
513
00:26:07,280 --> 00:26:10,400
guest, there's a ratio of guest
to host.
514
00:26:10,400 --> 00:26:13,160
And I don't know if you've seen
the reports that Pod Met puts
515
00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:20,400
out this ratio was one host, 25
guests want to be on A1 host
516
00:26:20,400 --> 00:26:22,440
show.
So look at that ratio, right?
517
00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:26,440
And then within six months that
number change from 1:00 to 46.
518
00:26:26,560 --> 00:26:29,720
I don't know what that number is
now, which means that there are
519
00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:33,280
a lot more guests out there than
there are hosts.
520
00:26:33,280 --> 00:26:37,600
Because as to point to said, it
does take a lot of work to put
521
00:26:37,600 --> 00:26:41,160
this production into play and
push this episodes out.
522
00:26:41,480 --> 00:26:46,000
So if you think about it, you're
not charging them to do the
523
00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:47,880
production work.
That's that's something that
524
00:26:47,880 --> 00:26:50,920
we're already going to do.
The value that we bring is the
525
00:26:50,920 --> 00:26:55,960
exposure to their basically
exposure to our audience.
526
00:26:56,240 --> 00:27:01,640
Why does John Lee Dumas charge
$3500 for you to go and be a
527
00:27:01,640 --> 00:27:05,080
guest on this show?
Because he has a guarantee of a
528
00:27:05,160 --> 00:27:09,320
1,000,000 downloads.
But even then, there has been
529
00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:12,960
reports where it doesn't really
bode that well for the guest.
530
00:27:13,360 --> 00:27:16,960
Unless if you go to a very niche
podcast, which is what Sid
531
00:27:16,960 --> 00:27:20,120
provides, it's a very niche
podcast, you're going to find
532
00:27:20,120 --> 00:27:22,720
exactly who you're going to
serve.
533
00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:25,880
And that's where it makes point
to actually charge and have a
534
00:27:25,880 --> 00:27:28,800
fee because you're not charging
for the production work.
535
00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:31,080
That's something nobody's going
to pay for.
536
00:27:31,240 --> 00:27:35,320
But what you say is, hey, I'm
charging you to be a guest on
537
00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:38,880
the show so you have access to
my audience of 200 that are
538
00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:44,160
absolutely going to purchase
from you at a 97% rate versus if
539
00:27:44,160 --> 00:27:48,480
you were to go on a very massive
podcast and were to expect, you
540
00:27:48,480 --> 00:27:51,960
know, maybe 2-3 sales.
So that's my take on why it just
541
00:27:51,960 --> 00:27:53,040
makes so much sense.
Thanks.
542
00:27:53,560 --> 00:27:56,880
And Janae, I think that's a
brilliant point is you're you're
543
00:27:56,880 --> 00:28:00,360
offering exposure to your
audience and I think there's a
544
00:28:00,360 --> 00:28:02,480
ton of value in that, Janae.
So thank you for sharing.
545
00:28:02,480 --> 00:28:03,520
I have a question for you,
Janae.
546
00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:07,280
So you said you've done this.
Was it a difficult decision for
547
00:28:07,280 --> 00:28:08,920
you to make?
And how did you figure out what
548
00:28:08,920 --> 00:28:10,920
you were going to charge for
that, if you don't mind
549
00:28:10,920 --> 00:28:13,000
answering that question?
Absolutely.
550
00:28:13,000 --> 00:28:16,880
I, I experimented different
price points and some people
551
00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:18,920
were coming just for the
exposure and they're like, hey,
552
00:28:18,920 --> 00:28:22,640
I'm happy to pay $100.
But then when I raise the price
553
00:28:22,640 --> 00:28:26,640
to $1500, that was strategically
for me is I don't want, I didn't
554
00:28:26,640 --> 00:28:29,880
want anybody to just come on and
put good time on the show.
555
00:28:30,400 --> 00:28:34,480
So that's something that didn't
bode well yet, right?
556
00:28:34,480 --> 00:28:38,200
It's nobody's going to pay 1500
bucks yet, but I'm going to make
557
00:28:38,200 --> 00:28:43,360
a point in the future to say,
OK, if you're already paying an
558
00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:49,560
agency for you to find hosts for
to be guests on, then I'm sure
559
00:28:49,560 --> 00:28:53,800
you can also pay to be a guest
on that show.
560
00:28:54,280 --> 00:28:56,320
Again, experiment is ongoing.
Thank you.
561
00:28:56,720 --> 00:28:59,880
So how did you arrive at 1500?
Do you mind me asking that
562
00:28:59,880 --> 00:29:02,000
question, Janine?
I'm just interested in like, was
563
00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:03,920
that like a thought?
Because I'm a money guy, right?
564
00:29:03,920 --> 00:29:06,760
So I'm thinking about was there
a cost idea here?
565
00:29:06,760 --> 00:29:09,160
Was there a time element to
that?
566
00:29:09,280 --> 00:29:12,120
What was it that you landed on
to get to that number?
567
00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:14,120
And maybe just arbitrary, but
what was your?
568
00:29:14,120 --> 00:29:16,840
Thought, well, initially it was
arbitrary, but then when I
569
00:29:16,840 --> 00:29:20,600
looked at all of the things that
I am putting together and
570
00:29:20,600 --> 00:29:27,200
pushing out for them, 10 reels,
podcast episode on, on the, on
571
00:29:27,200 --> 00:29:29,040
the different social media
platforms, of course.
572
00:29:29,200 --> 00:29:30,760
But then there's also on
YouTube.
573
00:29:31,040 --> 00:29:33,640
Then there's a book chapter,
there's an article on the blog
574
00:29:33,640 --> 00:29:35,400
post, there's an article on
LinkedIn.
575
00:29:35,400 --> 00:29:39,120
There's so many different things
that they get out of that one
576
00:29:39,120 --> 00:29:42,520
interaction with me.
And that's why like, hey, this
577
00:29:42,720 --> 00:29:45,640
makes sense to charge 1500 bucks
for less.
578
00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:48,720
I wanted to just see, hey, these
are some top notch people come
579
00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:52,200
in, they claiming to make 7
million figure businesses.
580
00:29:52,440 --> 00:29:56,200
Like OK, do you have the money
to pay to come talk about it?
581
00:29:56,480 --> 00:29:59,080
Let's take a look.
So that's been an experiment.
582
00:29:59,720 --> 00:30:01,080
And Janae, I think that's
brilliant.
583
00:30:01,080 --> 00:30:03,360
And, and I think we need to lean
into what Janae just said
584
00:30:03,360 --> 00:30:07,120
because what he's offering in my
view is a marketing platform.
585
00:30:07,680 --> 00:30:09,680
He's talking about he's going to
give you this, he's going to
586
00:30:09,680 --> 00:30:11,360
give you that.
It's not just, hey, come on my
587
00:30:11,360 --> 00:30:13,760
show and if anybody tunes in and
listen to it's great.
588
00:30:14,160 --> 00:30:17,240
He is absolutely actually, if
you could put a poll out there,
589
00:30:17,240 --> 00:30:20,760
if have other people charged to
for, you know, to have somebody
590
00:30:20,760 --> 00:30:22,880
on the show.
But what I was saying is Janae's
591
00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:26,920
giving them a package and I
think this is a great idea.
592
00:30:27,080 --> 00:30:30,320
If you can build a package
around their appearance, I think
593
00:30:30,320 --> 00:30:32,080
that is a beautiful thing to do,
Janae.
594
00:30:32,080 --> 00:30:35,200
So I I absolutely salute you
because I think you're doing
595
00:30:35,200 --> 00:30:37,280
more than just, hey, come on my
show, you're showing them,
596
00:30:37,400 --> 00:30:39,440
here's a package of what you're
going to get here are the
597
00:30:39,440 --> 00:30:42,840
different components because you
realize, like I do Janae, that
598
00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:45,800
just their appearance on the
show isn't going to be enough.
599
00:30:46,160 --> 00:30:48,720
It's the other pieces to that
that really building a.
600
00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:51,880
Thing that Janae is talking
about, which is underlining of
601
00:30:51,880 --> 00:30:55,240
what I was talking about as
well, is what they're paying for
602
00:30:55,240 --> 00:30:58,360
is access.
Access to your community and
603
00:30:58,360 --> 00:31:01,160
what you do to promote, whether
it's an article on LinkedIn, an
604
00:31:01,160 --> 00:31:03,640
article on your website, social
media posts, right?
605
00:31:03,960 --> 00:31:06,120
They're paying for access to
your community.
606
00:31:06,120 --> 00:31:09,400
I have not done this yet.
I only said I'm thinking about
607
00:31:09,400 --> 00:31:10,920
it.
But the more I think about it,
608
00:31:10,920 --> 00:31:15,240
the more viable it sounds to me
for the few guests I get a year.
609
00:31:15,640 --> 00:31:19,160
And when I add up the production
costs and my time and then the
610
00:31:19,160 --> 00:31:21,640
social media marketing costs and
things of that nature to put
611
00:31:21,640 --> 00:31:24,760
this stuff out, there's an
expense to this.
612
00:31:24,760 --> 00:31:27,600
And you know, when somebody's
trying to be on your show, why
613
00:31:27,600 --> 00:31:31,040
shouldn't you receive
compensation or offset the
614
00:31:31,040 --> 00:31:33,280
expenses for that?
That's really where my thought
615
00:31:33,280 --> 00:31:35,240
process is now.
I'll let you know if I decide to
616
00:31:35,240 --> 00:31:37,800
do it, but that's where my
thought process is right now.
617
00:31:38,120 --> 00:31:44,040
So could you maybe present it to
the the potential guest as a
618
00:31:44,040 --> 00:31:46,000
choice?
Well, you know, if you just want
619
00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:48,040
to come on the show, that's
great.
620
00:31:48,040 --> 00:31:49,640
We'll do a little interview with
you.
621
00:31:49,760 --> 00:31:54,200
We'll promote what you have.
But if you want like the full
622
00:31:54,200 --> 00:32:00,520
package, that's when I think I
could probably introduce maybe
623
00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:03,720
you know that there's there'd be
a price to that, but at least
624
00:32:03,720 --> 00:32:06,920
you're giving them the choice.
Yeah, I think that's a fairpoint
625
00:32:06,920 --> 00:32:09,920
to Dr. and it sounds like maybe
we've we've landed the plane
626
00:32:09,920 --> 00:32:11,680
here for cities.
Got a whole lot of things to
627
00:32:11,680 --> 00:32:13,600
think about today.
But go ahead BC I know you had a
628
00:32:13,600 --> 00:32:16,440
comment you want to make.
I wonder if we can clarify
629
00:32:16,440 --> 00:32:19,280
something real quick regarding
kind of the meantime.
630
00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:22,600
So assuming that we take on this
particular approach to our
631
00:32:22,600 --> 00:32:26,480
podcasts and if it does kind of
out of the nature of charging
632
00:32:26,480 --> 00:32:29,160
someone to give them access to
our audience, it does kind of
633
00:32:29,160 --> 00:32:32,520
lower the frequency of people
who may come along who are
634
00:32:32,520 --> 00:32:36,960
willing to engage that way.
Do we in the meantime build our
635
00:32:36,960 --> 00:32:41,880
brand as a solo show whereas
predominantly the content is we
636
00:32:41,880 --> 00:32:45,440
are the solo host of the show,
we are the thought leadership.
637
00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:50,280
We are the ones building this
machine that has this audience,
638
00:32:50,280 --> 00:32:54,680
that has these numbers of
engagement that sell itself to
639
00:32:54,680 --> 00:32:57,080
potential paid guests in the
meantime.
640
00:32:57,560 --> 00:33:00,240
And then being the guest is kind
of having a guest on the show
641
00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,560
when it does happen, is kind of
the unique moment for the show
642
00:33:03,560 --> 00:33:05,200
or the special moment for the
show.
643
00:33:05,520 --> 00:33:08,480
I agree BC I think that was well
said and I just want to put in
644
00:33:08,480 --> 00:33:09,840
here what Ashley said in the
comments.
645
00:33:09,840 --> 00:33:11,920
A lot of people I interview are
barely hanging by a thread.
646
00:33:11,920 --> 00:33:13,600
I get that too.
I mean that's a whole another
647
00:33:13,600 --> 00:33:15,280
thing.
And I think it comes down to
648
00:33:15,280 --> 00:33:17,200
what I talk about on the show
all the time is what is your
649
00:33:17,200 --> 00:33:18,880
purpose of your show?
What is your why?
650
00:33:19,360 --> 00:33:21,960
If your why is your trying to
make money with this and I think
651
00:33:21,960 --> 00:33:25,600
this is a viable option, but I
want to go ahead and get to our
652
00:33:25,600 --> 00:33:28,280
last question because Dr. and I
talked about this beforehand and
653
00:33:28,280 --> 00:33:29,920
she's like, I hope we get to
this question.
654
00:33:29,920 --> 00:33:34,440
So here's our next question and
this one comes from Reddit as
655
00:33:34,440 --> 00:33:36,840
well.
And this person writes found out
656
00:33:36,840 --> 00:33:40,960
my podcast editing service was
using AI to cut my episodes
657
00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:43,800
should I care?
So I've been using this podcast
658
00:33:43,800 --> 00:33:46,880
editing service for three months
and the edits have been fine.
659
00:33:47,280 --> 00:33:50,200
Yesterday I found out by
accident that they're using AI
660
00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:53,040
tools to do the initial cuts in
noise removal.
661
00:33:53,040 --> 00:33:54,840
Then a human does the final
Polish.
662
00:33:55,360 --> 00:33:58,240
On one hand, the final product
sounds good and they're fast.
663
00:33:58,600 --> 00:34:01,760
On the other hand, I feel kind
of weird about it, like I
664
00:34:01,760 --> 00:34:03,520
thought I was paying for human
editing.
665
00:34:03,960 --> 00:34:07,480
Am I being unreasonable?
Does it matter how they edit as
666
00:34:07,480 --> 00:34:10,800
long as the result is good?
And I thought that was a really
667
00:34:10,800 --> 00:34:12,560
good question.
And I see Ashley, you want to
668
00:34:12,560 --> 00:34:13,239
go?
Go ahead.
669
00:34:13,639 --> 00:34:17,920
I would say that as long as the
results are good, it shouldn't
670
00:34:17,920 --> 00:34:23,320
matter, and also that be aware
that almost every editing tool
671
00:34:23,719 --> 00:34:29,440
that is in existence now has
some kind of editing feature on
672
00:34:29,440 --> 00:34:33,639
it, and in the long run it can
really save you time.
673
00:34:33,639 --> 00:34:38,000
I'm not saying let AI edit your
entire podcast, but if there are
674
00:34:38,000 --> 00:34:41,480
parts of it that can speed up
the process and you get a good
675
00:34:41,480 --> 00:34:45,480
result from it, by all means.
Because in the long run, to do
676
00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:48,719
these processes manually is
going to end up costing you
677
00:34:48,719 --> 00:34:50,679
more.
I think that's a very good
678
00:34:50,679 --> 00:34:52,480
point, Ashley.
And and that's the thing, like
679
00:34:52,480 --> 00:34:56,199
I, I still think there's value
in a human editing it.
680
00:34:56,199 --> 00:34:58,520
But I think what I hear you
saying, and I'm going to go to
681
00:34:58,520 --> 00:35:02,040
Jonathan and Dr. in a second,
but I what I think I hear you
682
00:35:02,040 --> 00:35:05,360
saying, Ashley, is let them do
some of the the routine stuff so
683
00:35:05,360 --> 00:35:07,920
that you don't have to spend so
much time on the simple stuff.
684
00:35:07,920 --> 00:35:09,080
Is that what you're saying,
Ashley?
685
00:35:09,320 --> 00:35:13,560
Yeah, like if there is something
like for example, you use AI to
686
00:35:13,560 --> 00:35:16,800
format your show notes in a
particular way.
687
00:35:17,280 --> 00:35:20,880
Like for example, you need
brackets put around your time
688
00:35:20,880 --> 00:35:23,520
codes.
That takes at least 4 or 5
689
00:35:23,520 --> 00:35:27,480
minutes to do it manually.
But if you tell AI to, hey, I
690
00:35:27,480 --> 00:35:30,440
want you to format my time codes
with brackets around them and I
691
00:35:30,440 --> 00:35:33,240
want them to look like this,
that really could shave some
692
00:35:33,240 --> 00:35:36,080
time off.
Also, you know those of you who
693
00:35:36,080 --> 00:35:41,320
used a script, I don't use it to
to remove all the uhs and UMS
694
00:35:41,560 --> 00:35:44,680
but I use it to show me where
they are because if I were to
695
00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:48,080
look for each one manually, that
would take a lot more time for
696
00:35:48,080 --> 00:35:50,000
sure.
Go ahead Jonathan, I see one to
697
00:35:50,000 --> 00:35:51,080
make a comment.
Yeah.
698
00:35:51,080 --> 00:35:54,680
So I would, I would, you know,
check what you're being charged
699
00:35:55,040 --> 00:35:58,000
and compare it with what some of
the AI tools might be.
700
00:35:58,120 --> 00:36:00,320
Because if you it's an
exorbitant amount and they're
701
00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:03,960
not doing much more than just
the clean up, then maybe you
702
00:36:03,960 --> 00:36:06,880
take on your editing yourself
because AI can handle a lot of
703
00:36:06,880 --> 00:36:08,920
it.
But if it's a reasonable amount,
704
00:36:09,480 --> 00:36:13,880
everybody's using AI to edit and
there's benefits to it.
705
00:36:13,880 --> 00:36:18,000
It is quicker and in a lot of
ways it can be a cleaner edit
706
00:36:18,080 --> 00:36:20,480
when the AI does it then if
you're doing it.
707
00:36:20,680 --> 00:36:23,200
But yeah, if you're happy with
it and they're charging you a
708
00:36:23,200 --> 00:36:25,160
reasonable amount then just keep
paying it.
709
00:36:25,280 --> 00:36:27,000
I agree with you and Dave.
Put this in the comment.
710
00:36:27,000 --> 00:36:30,200
There's a difference between an
editor person and an editing
711
00:36:30,200 --> 00:36:32,360
tool.
A hammer, a hammer's a tool, but
712
00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:34,560
a hammer on its own could never
build a house.
713
00:36:34,600 --> 00:36:37,600
And Dave, I think that's
brilliant observation there.
714
00:36:37,920 --> 00:36:40,040
And I apologize the people
flashing got ahead of me.
715
00:36:40,040 --> 00:36:43,040
So if you'd flash again or jump
up here, if you've got a comment
716
00:36:43,040 --> 00:36:44,720
about this, just go ahead and
jump, right?
717
00:36:44,720 --> 00:36:48,560
In I'm going to jump in.
This is such a such a fertile
718
00:36:48,560 --> 00:36:52,560
ground here of a subject someone
said to me one time because I
719
00:36:52,560 --> 00:36:57,360
had asked them should I feel
guilty about using AI and they
720
00:36:57,360 --> 00:37:00,360
said no.
If you are ever asked about this
721
00:37:00,360 --> 00:37:05,640
by a client, just stand up and
say absolutely I'm using AI and
722
00:37:05,640 --> 00:37:09,200
thank God I am or else I would
have to probably charge you a
723
00:37:09,200 --> 00:37:12,160
lot more.
You know, a lot of people don't
724
00:37:12,160 --> 00:37:17,200
realize that there is a skill
that you have to acquire in
725
00:37:17,200 --> 00:37:21,040
using AI.
You don't just put a one
726
00:37:21,040 --> 00:37:26,280
sentence prompt in the field and
then copy paste the results.
727
00:37:26,760 --> 00:37:32,360
That is not using AI correctly.
You know, you go back and forth,
728
00:37:32,360 --> 00:37:36,200
you eliminate, you add here, you
kind of Frankenstein it
729
00:37:36,200 --> 00:37:39,600
together, maybe this sentence up
here and part of that sentence
730
00:37:39,600 --> 00:37:42,360
down there and you put those
together so that it is a
731
00:37:42,360 --> 00:37:45,960
collaboration between you and
AI.
732
00:37:46,240 --> 00:37:53,760
And it takes time and effort and
in my case, money to learn how
733
00:37:53,760 --> 00:38:00,000
to use AI correctly.
And so yeah, I am proud to say
734
00:38:00,080 --> 00:38:05,800
that I absolutely use AI and,
and I know that I am using it
735
00:38:05,800 --> 00:38:08,560
the right way.
Oh, look who wants to speak.
736
00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:11,360
Go ahead, Mark.
I love your point, Dr., and I
737
00:38:11,360 --> 00:38:13,920
think you make a really good
point, especially, you know,
738
00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:17,080
just, yeah, be confident about
it as an editor if, if you're
739
00:38:17,080 --> 00:38:21,080
asked and when you said, you
know, it's not as easy as just
740
00:38:21,080 --> 00:38:23,440
one prompt.
Yes, that's true.
741
00:38:23,440 --> 00:38:26,840
But I just wanted to remind
people that these AI agents
742
00:38:26,840 --> 00:38:30,320
exist now.
And although I haven't seen any
743
00:38:30,320 --> 00:38:34,840
use cases where you can go and
tell Open Claw to go edit a
744
00:38:34,840 --> 00:38:38,520
podcast, I don't know if it's
quite there yet, but don't be
745
00:38:38,520 --> 00:38:42,040
surprised if you see that
sometime this year or maybe
746
00:38:42,040 --> 00:38:43,680
early next year.
I think it's coming.
747
00:38:44,480 --> 00:38:46,520
I think that's a.
Brilliant point, Mark, because
748
00:38:46,720 --> 00:38:49,520
I'm just thinking about, we use
the script in my production
749
00:38:49,520 --> 00:38:50,920
thing and at BC.
I haven't forgot about you and
750
00:38:50,920 --> 00:38:54,080
Janae, but we use the script and
it actually has the ability to
751
00:38:54,080 --> 00:38:55,760
do some of that.
Right now it says go ahead and
752
00:38:55,880 --> 00:38:58,160
remove retakes, go ahead and do
this and do that.
753
00:38:58,160 --> 00:39:01,240
So I hear what Dr. saying in
that, yeah, you got to have some
754
00:39:01,240 --> 00:39:03,680
experience in this.
But at the same time, these
755
00:39:03,680 --> 00:39:06,320
tools are presenting something
that just cuts it like a big old
756
00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:07,800
knife and does what it wants to
do.
757
00:39:07,800 --> 00:39:10,480
So we're kind of already there,
to be honest.
758
00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:16,400
I am constantly trying to not
stay ahead of AI because I know
759
00:39:16,400 --> 00:39:20,160
it's going to be a losing battle
eventually, but it is.
760
00:39:20,600 --> 00:39:23,440
It has forced me to up my game
in my business.
761
00:39:23,440 --> 00:39:26,280
For instance, I now do press
releases.
762
00:39:26,520 --> 00:39:30,880
I now have a social media
person, I have someone who can
763
00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:35,080
do a website on my team.
I I have all of these things.
764
00:39:35,400 --> 00:39:39,640
So editing is not just, it's not
just a 1 trick pony with me.
765
00:39:40,320 --> 00:39:45,280
AI is definitely a viable tool.
And if someone, you know, my
766
00:39:45,280 --> 00:39:48,400
clients are kind of divided into
two different groups.
767
00:39:48,680 --> 00:39:52,200
One is, you know, I have the
time to learn this stuff, I just
768
00:39:52,200 --> 00:39:53,360
don't want to learn it.
I just don't.
769
00:39:53,360 --> 00:39:56,400
You do it, you do it.
That's one client.
770
00:39:56,680 --> 00:39:59,960
And then another client is I
just have no time.
771
00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:02,280
I have no time to learn any of
this.
772
00:40:02,320 --> 00:40:05,160
So you do it.
Considering that those are my
773
00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:08,120
two types of clients, I think
I'm OK.
774
00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:10,920
And DRI think what you're really
saying, and I don't want to
775
00:40:10,920 --> 00:40:12,800
speak for you, but you've
pivoted in your business.
776
00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:15,880
That is what you're saying is
you're realizing that some of
777
00:40:15,880 --> 00:40:20,840
the the routine editing stuff
isn't isn't driving it anymore
778
00:40:20,840 --> 00:40:22,440
and you're saying I'm going to
offer this and I'm going to
779
00:40:22,440 --> 00:40:24,720
offer that I'm going to offer
this because you're offering
780
00:40:24,720 --> 00:40:26,160
more services.
Is that correct?
781
00:40:26,160 --> 00:40:30,480
Dr. That's correct, absolutely.
Go ahead, BCI, saw you wanted to
782
00:40:30,480 --> 00:40:33,280
make a comment.
Yeah, I think the the the main
783
00:40:33,280 --> 00:40:36,600
take away here is that so long
as the human element is still
784
00:40:36,600 --> 00:40:41,080
involved in the process, AI is
not used as the singular
785
00:40:41,080 --> 00:40:43,480
function through which all the
editing is done.
786
00:40:43,760 --> 00:40:47,240
You should be in the clear.
I use Riverside for a lot of
787
00:40:47,240 --> 00:40:50,600
production use and even though
it's it's elevated pretty pretty
788
00:40:50,600 --> 00:40:55,360
far and its ability to identify
good clips or hooks or segments
789
00:40:55,360 --> 00:40:57,880
and whatnot.
More often than not, I think
790
00:40:57,880 --> 00:41:01,320
every second or third clip or
something that it makes, I still
791
00:41:01,320 --> 00:41:05,040
have to go in because it has a
really awkward start or stopping
792
00:41:05,040 --> 00:41:08,240
moment that I need to shift one
way or another.
793
00:41:08,240 --> 00:41:11,640
Otherwise it just has a weird
flow if I take it as is.
794
00:41:11,880 --> 00:41:15,600
So as long as you're making sure
someone's eyes or ears are still
795
00:41:15,600 --> 00:41:19,720
a a person's human beings eyes
and ears are still being used to
796
00:41:19,720 --> 00:41:24,240
review and double check the work
that AI has put the foundation
797
00:41:24,240 --> 00:41:25,880
on.
You should be in the clear.
798
00:41:26,240 --> 00:41:28,520
And again, if you not everyone
comes from a broadcasting
799
00:41:28,520 --> 00:41:31,960
background and not everyone goes
into podcasting knowing how to
800
00:41:31,960 --> 00:41:35,600
work the hard way, like using
Premiere Pro or cap cut to do
801
00:41:35,600 --> 00:41:39,440
these huge long production
sessions and have control over
802
00:41:39,440 --> 00:41:43,080
every bit in piece that goes
into a podcast, post production
803
00:41:43,160 --> 00:41:45,680
elements.
So and if, especially if you're
804
00:41:45,680 --> 00:41:48,360
an entrepreneur building a
business, you need to utilize
805
00:41:48,360 --> 00:41:52,160
some kind of tool to consolidate
the process, optimize your time,
806
00:41:52,400 --> 00:41:54,840
make sure that there's content
available within a reasonable
807
00:41:54,840 --> 00:41:57,200
time frame to make sure that
your promotion is pretty
808
00:41:57,200 --> 00:41:59,600
consistent.
So just keep put your eyes on it
809
00:41:59,600 --> 00:42:02,680
just to make sure that you're
involved and on some level to
810
00:42:02,680 --> 00:42:08,480
make sure that some third party
force is not the end all be all
811
00:42:08,480 --> 00:42:10,600
for your stuff.
Janae, I want to go to you and
812
00:42:10,600 --> 00:42:12,120
then I want to go to sit.
Go ahead, Janae.
813
00:42:12,520 --> 00:42:17,200
You know, I wanted to talk back
about the using AI properly and
814
00:42:17,720 --> 00:42:21,640
knowing how to prompt it well.
And what's funny is that growing
815
00:42:21,640 --> 00:42:26,480
up text messaging or using AM or
Facebook chat or all that's new
816
00:42:26,480 --> 00:42:31,000
stuff, but it wants to mention
AIM we all at least I grew up on
817
00:42:31,000 --> 00:42:33,520
texting people more than
anything else.
818
00:42:33,520 --> 00:42:37,760
So texting and talking with AI
has been like second nature.
819
00:42:37,760 --> 00:42:39,280
I could just talk about
literally anything.
820
00:42:39,280 --> 00:42:41,920
And that's something that we all
need to get better at.
821
00:42:41,920 --> 00:42:45,720
But to point what Mark was
making with Open Claw and all of
822
00:42:45,720 --> 00:42:48,320
these things that are coming up,
these agents are going to be
823
00:42:48,320 --> 00:42:53,280
able to do so much more faster.
And if you are just following
824
00:42:53,280 --> 00:42:58,680
the news at all, literally every
two to three weeks there's a new
825
00:42:58,680 --> 00:43:01,920
model everyone you try to up,
you know, one up being the other
826
00:43:01,920 --> 00:43:04,560
one.
Just today, Grok 4.2 just
827
00:43:04,560 --> 00:43:08,480
dropped, which is the largest
model that's out there.
828
00:43:08,560 --> 00:43:13,680
Being able to run 16 concurrent
agents at the same time, it's
829
00:43:13,680 --> 00:43:17,480
kind of insane what's possible.
So we're not too far away from
830
00:43:17,480 --> 00:43:20,800
from from that at all.
So these conversation that we're
831
00:43:20,800 --> 00:43:25,200
having here in person, I think
they're going to have a lot more
832
00:43:25,200 --> 00:43:31,000
value over AI produced or edited
content in the future. 100%
833
00:43:31,120 --> 00:43:32,840
Janae, go ahead Sid.
And then I don't know if Mark
834
00:43:32,840 --> 00:43:34,760
wanted to jump in, but go ahead,
Sid, you had flashed.
835
00:43:35,120 --> 00:43:39,280
As one of the only people on
this stage that is not an editor
836
00:43:39,680 --> 00:43:43,800
and that pays to have his show
edited, I'm just going to say
837
00:43:43,800 --> 00:43:46,280
very clearly I don't care that
they're using AI.
838
00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:49,920
Good for them for figuring out
how to improve their processes,
839
00:43:49,920 --> 00:43:52,560
how to improve their flow, how
to improve their efficiency.
840
00:43:53,080 --> 00:43:55,280
I could careless what tools
they're using.
841
00:43:55,720 --> 00:43:57,720
What I care about is the end
product.
842
00:43:57,720 --> 00:44:00,760
How does the end product sound?
Did the show turn out great?
843
00:44:00,760 --> 00:44:03,200
Was it done on time so that we
can get all of our other stuff
844
00:44:03,200 --> 00:44:05,080
done?
That's what I care about and I
845
00:44:05,080 --> 00:44:06,840
don't.
I can bet you that none of you
846
00:44:06,840 --> 00:44:11,200
care or anybody listening care
about what AI tools somebody is
847
00:44:11,200 --> 00:44:14,320
using to do their job more
efficiently, whatever their job
848
00:44:14,320 --> 00:44:16,640
is.
So at the end of the day, I'm
849
00:44:16,640 --> 00:44:19,920
getting a fair rate.
I'm getting a great quality end
850
00:44:19,960 --> 00:44:21,720
product that I'm really proud
of.
851
00:44:22,160 --> 00:44:26,800
And if she uses 10 AI tools, one
AI tool or no AI tools, I don't
852
00:44:26,800 --> 00:44:28,840
care.
What I care about is the output
853
00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:30,040
that I'm getting all.
Right.
854
00:44:30,040 --> 00:44:31,600
So let me ask you a follow up
question.
855
00:44:32,400 --> 00:44:36,800
Are you assuming that a human
being is listening to that at
856
00:44:36,800 --> 00:44:38,920
some level?
Or are you totally cool if
857
00:44:38,920 --> 00:44:41,200
somebody just uses AI bots to
handle the?
858
00:44:41,200 --> 00:44:44,600
Whole thing, I don't think that
AI bot can handle the whole
859
00:44:44,600 --> 00:44:47,800
thing right now, but I know that
she's involved in it.
860
00:44:47,880 --> 00:44:49,400
I know that she's listening to
it.
861
00:44:49,400 --> 00:44:52,000
I know because she asked me
questions about things and she
862
00:44:52,400 --> 00:44:55,360
we talk about different things.
So I know that she's involved in
863
00:44:55,360 --> 00:44:57,520
it and I know that she's
listening to it.
864
00:44:57,960 --> 00:44:59,840
And that also has to do with I
trust her.
865
00:45:00,280 --> 00:45:02,960
Like she's been with me since
episode 35 and I'm on episode
866
00:45:02,960 --> 00:45:04,960
175.
I trust her.
867
00:45:05,360 --> 00:45:08,160
So if she wants to use a new AI
tool in her process, then let
868
00:45:08,160 --> 00:45:09,800
her use a new AI tool on her
process.
869
00:45:10,200 --> 00:45:12,920
But AI experts will tell you,
and I've talked to enough of
870
00:45:12,920 --> 00:45:16,240
them on my show recently, that
there needs to always be a human
871
00:45:16,240 --> 00:45:18,080
in the middle.
And I trust that there is a
872
00:45:18,080 --> 00:45:20,800
human in the middle of my
process because I know there is
873
00:45:20,800 --> 00:45:22,600
because we're talking, she and I
are talking about it.
874
00:45:22,840 --> 00:45:24,360
Mark, you had Mark.
I see you want to make a
875
00:45:24,360 --> 00:45:26,240
comment.
I was just going to say Sid, but
876
00:45:26,240 --> 00:45:30,520
the question it it was are you
comfortable with it?
877
00:45:30,600 --> 00:45:33,880
Let's say this editor of yours
goes away and you have to hire a
878
00:45:33,880 --> 00:45:38,280
new one.
And are you OK with it if they
879
00:45:38,440 --> 00:45:41,600
are using solely AI?
Let's hypothetically.
880
00:45:42,120 --> 00:45:43,920
That's a really great question
that I don't know that I have
881
00:45:43,920 --> 00:45:48,720
the answer to using 100% but but
but OK, I'm not going to do it.
882
00:45:48,960 --> 00:45:51,400
I don't have the time to do it.
I don't have the bandwidth to do
883
00:45:51,400 --> 00:45:53,880
it.
So if I pay somebody to edit my
884
00:45:53,880 --> 00:45:57,120
show and they're using all AI
and the the price that I'm
885
00:45:57,120 --> 00:46:00,920
paying reflects that there's no
human in the middle, then
886
00:46:00,920 --> 00:46:03,840
probably I get I probably say I
don't care, right?
887
00:46:04,120 --> 00:46:07,320
Because what I know is I don't
have the time or the bandwidth
888
00:46:07,320 --> 00:46:11,360
to do it to get it ready and put
it out there because he's got to
889
00:46:11,360 --> 00:46:13,440
go so many different places.
There's so many human steps in
890
00:46:13,440 --> 00:46:15,880
the process and putting it on
bus route and then putting it on
891
00:46:15,880 --> 00:46:17,680
YouTube and doing this and doing
that.
892
00:46:18,240 --> 00:46:23,760
I mean, she actually, my editor
actually writes my show notes.
893
00:46:24,520 --> 00:46:26,360
She does not use Buzz Sprout
show notes.
894
00:46:26,360 --> 00:46:29,520
And I've asked her why not like,
why haven't you used the Buzz
895
00:46:29,520 --> 00:46:31,320
Sprout show notes?
Because it makes it easier for
896
00:46:31,320 --> 00:46:33,840
you.
And her point, her comment back
897
00:46:33,840 --> 00:46:36,440
to me is I love writing.
I love listening to the show and
898
00:46:36,440 --> 00:46:39,800
I love doing that part.
So I'm not going to let AI do
899
00:46:39,800 --> 00:46:40,680
it.
So I don't know that I'm
900
00:46:40,680 --> 00:46:43,600
answering your question mark,
but you know, I mean, if I felt
901
00:46:43,600 --> 00:46:44,960
like I was getting a fair price
for it.
902
00:46:44,960 --> 00:46:48,200
But what I do know is Sid is not
going to edit and produce his
903
00:46:48,200 --> 00:46:49,920
own show.
I do not have the time for that.
904
00:46:50,800 --> 00:46:53,040
No, and I think Sid, I think
that's brilliant because you
905
00:46:53,040 --> 00:46:55,120
realize you can pay with your
money or you can pay with your
906
00:46:55,120 --> 00:46:56,520
time and you're paying with your
money.
907
00:46:56,960 --> 00:46:59,320
I think we have to accept that
this is a reality.
908
00:46:59,320 --> 00:47:01,760
I know Mark put some other
things in there as well that
909
00:47:01,760 --> 00:47:03,120
there are things that are going
to be doing.
910
00:47:03,120 --> 00:47:05,680
It's not the kind of they just
they work on the sideline.
911
00:47:05,680 --> 00:47:07,560
So I, I think it was really a
valuable discussion.
912
00:47:07,560 --> 00:47:10,360
I think at the end of the
discussion, honestly, I think
913
00:47:10,360 --> 00:47:13,200
there's an open debate because I
understand what Sid's saying.
914
00:47:13,200 --> 00:47:14,400
It's like, hey, I want the house
built.
915
00:47:14,400 --> 00:47:16,720
I don't really care how you
build it as long as it's sound
916
00:47:16,720 --> 00:47:19,120
and long as it's it does what it
does at the end of the day.
917
00:47:19,120 --> 00:47:22,080
But I guess my only question,
and we can kind of leave it with
918
00:47:22,080 --> 00:47:25,560
this question here at the end,
is if these the government and
919
00:47:25,560 --> 00:47:29,000
the states really start pressing
this that you have to disclose
920
00:47:29,040 --> 00:47:32,720
AI, does that become an issue in
the editing process?
921
00:47:32,920 --> 00:47:36,560
So if you think you're paying an
editing company to do all your
922
00:47:36,560 --> 00:47:41,000
stuff with a person, are we
going to have an issue that you
923
00:47:41,000 --> 00:47:44,960
have to disclose that it was
edited with AI or the show notes
924
00:47:44,960 --> 00:47:47,120
are written with AII know we've
talked about that a little bit
925
00:47:47,120 --> 00:47:49,400
on the show.
Does anybody have any comments
926
00:47:49,400 --> 00:47:52,200
as it relates?
We had a news story yesterday
927
00:47:52,200 --> 00:47:55,920
that we never got to, and it was
about Spotify.
928
00:47:56,240 --> 00:48:00,560
Over the past handful of months,
let's say 2-3 months, they've
929
00:48:00,560 --> 00:48:04,360
reported that all of their
coders no longer code.
930
00:48:05,200 --> 00:48:10,320
Their coders now essentially
babysit AI agents that are
931
00:48:10,320 --> 00:48:14,080
coding for them.
I feel like there's something to
932
00:48:14,080 --> 00:48:16,760
that when you think about that
scenario and whatever your
933
00:48:16,760 --> 00:48:19,000
question was, I think that can
that can apply.
934
00:48:19,000 --> 00:48:20,640
What was your question, Ralph
again?
935
00:48:20,720 --> 00:48:24,600
No, what I was saying is a lot
of government and states are
936
00:48:24,600 --> 00:48:28,080
saying if you have you have
content you've got to disclose.
937
00:48:28,080 --> 00:48:30,800
There's AI being used in that,
So what does that mean?
938
00:48:30,800 --> 00:48:33,600
Does that mean an AI voice?
Does that mean an AI script?
939
00:48:33,600 --> 00:48:34,920
Does that mean AI?
Right.
940
00:48:34,920 --> 00:48:38,760
So, yeah, so I'm saying, you
know, this is going to be
941
00:48:38,760 --> 00:48:42,400
something that I think we're
just going to start to see more
942
00:48:42,400 --> 00:48:46,760
and more of where, yeah, maybe
you do have to report it.
943
00:48:46,840 --> 00:48:49,600
You know, if that becomes some
kind of law, we'd have to report
944
00:48:49,600 --> 00:48:51,720
that.
Yes, we're using AI, but I think
945
00:48:51,720 --> 00:48:55,080
it's going to start to become a
standard that most people are
946
00:48:55,080 --> 00:48:58,440
going to be using AI.
And the idea is, is that they're
947
00:48:58,440 --> 00:49:00,240
going to be babysitting it,
right?
948
00:49:00,240 --> 00:49:03,800
They're going to be, you know,
similar to SIDS.
949
00:49:03,800 --> 00:49:07,360
His editor, right, That he knows
she's still listening, she's
950
00:49:07,360 --> 00:49:11,600
still checking the work.
BC described that too.
951
00:49:11,600 --> 00:49:15,320
But you can't just rely solely
on whatever Riverside spits out.
952
00:49:15,320 --> 00:49:17,640
Sometimes you got to go in and
babysit it.
953
00:49:17,640 --> 00:49:20,080
So I think, yes, it could be a
rule.
954
00:49:20,120 --> 00:49:23,880
And I think in many cases it's
not going to matter anymore.
955
00:49:23,880 --> 00:49:27,240
People are just going to accept
the fact that we're using AI as
956
00:49:27,240 --> 00:49:29,200
a tool.
I think you're right, Mark.
957
00:49:29,200 --> 00:49:31,720
It's kind of like when you see a
picture, you just assume it's
958
00:49:31,720 --> 00:49:33,880
been photoshopped or whatever
the right term is.
959
00:49:33,880 --> 00:49:36,240
You just, everybody does it.
So it's just an assumption.
960
00:49:36,240 --> 00:49:37,480
Dr. Did you want to say
something?
961
00:49:38,160 --> 00:49:43,360
It's it's just a cute little
disclaimer assisted by AI.
962
00:49:43,480 --> 00:49:44,960
Boom, That's it.
That's all you need.
963
00:49:45,280 --> 00:49:48,040
Or I wonder if we turn it around
and say this episode was fully
964
00:49:48,040 --> 00:49:50,600
developed by a human being and
that would be the selling point
965
00:49:50,840 --> 00:49:54,400
for some people who don't want
to be in the in the AI field.
966
00:49:54,960 --> 00:50:03,200
That would be something, sure.
I'm trying to imagine doing
967
00:50:03,200 --> 00:50:07,480
shows without AI right now.
It would be the most time
968
00:50:07,480 --> 00:50:11,760
consuming stuff and I'm not sure
that I would have the capacity
969
00:50:12,320 --> 00:50:15,200
to have more more than just a
couple clients doing that.
970
00:50:15,800 --> 00:50:17,760
I want to go to Ashley, but I
want to throw something out
971
00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:20,480
there before we wrap up today.
First thing, Mark speaking for
972
00:50:20,480 --> 00:50:22,680
me and for everybody else, we
want to wish you the best today
973
00:50:22,960 --> 00:50:24,920
and what's going on.
But the other thing I wanted to
974
00:50:24,920 --> 00:50:28,600
add to this is here's the scary
part of that Dr. What if
975
00:50:28,600 --> 00:50:30,760
tomorrow we woke up and the AI
didn't work?
976
00:50:31,640 --> 00:50:34,400
That is what keeps me up at
night sometimes because all of
977
00:50:34,400 --> 00:50:36,720
us have built this AI into our
process.
978
00:50:36,720 --> 00:50:37,880
So I'm going to throw that, but
go ahead.
979
00:50:37,880 --> 00:50:39,280
Ashley, you had a comment you
wanted to make.
980
00:50:39,760 --> 00:50:42,800
Oh, I was just going to say that
it would actually be pretty
981
00:50:42,800 --> 00:50:47,840
challenging to fully produce a
podcast without some kind of AI
982
00:50:47,840 --> 00:50:52,400
tool because it's built into
just darn near everything.
983
00:50:52,400 --> 00:50:56,480
I mean, I could probably come up
with AAI free workflow, but
984
00:50:56,760 --> 00:51:00,200
again, back to the original
point, what someone's going to
985
00:51:00,200 --> 00:51:04,520
charge you based on time if they
have AI assistance versus no AI
986
00:51:04,520 --> 00:51:08,480
assistance is night and day.
And also to your point about
987
00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:14,360
what if we woke up tomorrow and
AI didn't work, I think that's
988
00:51:14,360 --> 00:51:17,240
where we could draw a line in
the sand on your editors.
989
00:51:17,240 --> 00:51:21,160
Because the ones who have, you
know, started their careers only
990
00:51:21,160 --> 00:51:24,640
with AI assistants are going to
be have a completely different
991
00:51:24,640 --> 00:51:28,040
experience than those of us who
have been in since before there
992
00:51:28,040 --> 00:51:32,840
was such a wide AI adoption.
Well said and Dave, thank you a
993
00:51:32,840 --> 00:51:35,200
great again.
Dave said great point Ralph, he
994
00:51:35,200 --> 00:51:36,920
does his own work.
Listen, I want to, I want to
995
00:51:36,920 --> 00:51:38,760
land this plaintive, I want to
keep everybody in our time
996
00:51:38,760 --> 00:51:40,640
limit.
I just want to invite everybody
997
00:51:40,640 --> 00:51:42,800
back tomorrow.
I have got more mailbag
998
00:51:42,800 --> 00:51:44,080
questions.
Tomorrow we're going to do wins
999
00:51:44,080 --> 00:51:45,800
of the week and I'm going to do
it tomorrow.
1000
00:51:45,800 --> 00:51:49,560
We're going to talk about if you
got $5000 today and you could
1001
00:51:49,560 --> 00:51:52,360
use it for your content
creation, where would you spend
1002
00:51:52,360 --> 00:51:53,880
it?
So make sure you come back and
1003
00:51:53,880 --> 00:51:54,960
join us tomorrow.
Thank you.
1004
00:51:55,120 --> 00:51:57,360
I apologize for a little bit of
the technical difficulties
1005
00:51:57,360 --> 00:52:00,080
today, but we made it through.
So everybody have a great day
1006
00:52:00,080 --> 00:52:03,280
and Mark, again, you're in our
thoughts and our our well wishes
1007
00:52:03,280 --> 00:52:04,960
for today.
So everybody have a great day
1008
00:52:04,960 --> 00:52:06,800
and make sure you join us again
tomorrow on the show.