Sept. 18, 2025

372 - Steve from Blues Clues, Web Traffic Mysteries, & the Branding Blues

372 - Steve from Blues Clues, Web Traffic Mysteries, & the Branding Blues

Steve Burns’ new podcast Alive grabbed attention with a teaser clip, and it got us thinking: what makes some stories stick instantly? We break down why his moment connected, whether audio flaws matter as much as we believe, and why relatability often outweighs production polish. We also highlight a case study from community member Sid, who is testing a website redesign to see if it shifts listener engagement. The conversation ends with a more significant question: when your show changes, is it really the branding that matters, or the way you let your audience see more of who you are?

Episode Highlights:

[02:03] Empowered Podcasting Conference

[06:05] Analyzing Steve Burns' Podcast Clip

[09:48] Discussion on Audio Quality in Podcasts

[25:11] Amanda's TikTok Journey

[27:49] Sid's Website Analytics Discovery

[30:24] Website Changes and Podcast Analytics

[43:14] Deciding on Podcast Rebranding

[51:20] Character and Authenticity in Podcasting

Links & Resources:

Join The Empowered Podcasting Facebook Group:

www.facebook.com/groups/empoweredpodcasting⁠

Get Your Tickets for The Empowered Podcasting Conference:

www.empoweredpodcasting.com

Steve Burns with Hospice Nurse Julie:

www.instagram.com/reel/DOra66kAYB-/?igsh=aTJ0dzNjNG9uaGt6

Alive With Steve Burns:

https://lemonadamedia.com/show/alive-with-steve-burns

Amanda Sharp on TikTok:

www.tiktok.com/@amandaannsharp?_t=ZT-8zpRa3Gv1Re&_r=1

The Trend Report with Sid Meadows:

www.sidmeadows.com/episode163

Unconventional Leaders with Heather Parady:

www.heatherparady.com/podcast

Remember to rate, follow, share, and review our podcast. Your support helps us grow and bring valuable content to our community.

Join us LIVE every weekday morning at 7 am ET (US) on ⁠Clubhouse⁠: ⁠⁠⁠ https://www.clubhouse.com/house/empowered-podcasting-e6nlrk0w⁠⁠

Or Join us on Chatter: https://preview.chattersocial.io/group/98a69881-f328-4eae-bf3c-9b0bb741481d

Live on YouTube: ⁠https://youtube.com/@marcronick⁠

Brought to you by⁠ ⁠iRonickMedia.com⁠

Please note that some links may be affiliate links, which support the hosts of the PMC. Thank you!

--- Send in your mailbag question at:⁠ https://www.podpage.com/pmc/contact/⁠ or ⁠marc@ironickmedia.com⁠

Want to be a guest on The Podcasting Morning Chat? Send me a message on PodMatch, here:

⁠https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/1729879899384520035bad21b⁠


1
00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:07,440
Good morning podcasting Morning
Chat.

2
00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:14,000
Today is Thursday, September
18th, 2025, and today we're

3
00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:17,640
helping you decide if your
podcast content is changing.

4
00:00:17,880 --> 00:00:22,840
Should your title, logo and feed
change to or is a refresh

5
00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:27,080
enough?
So if you're listening live on

6
00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:29,200
Clubhouse, hit the share button,
bottom left hand side of the

7
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:32,320
screen and share it.
However Clubhouse lets you.

8
00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,880
And if you're listening on
YouTube or via podcast, please

9
00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:37,760
share this episode with a fellow
podcaster.

10
00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:43,600
And now give me about 30 seconds
and we'll get things rolling.

11
00:00:43,800 --> 00:01:22,770
Thanks for being here.
Good morning again, podcasting,

12
00:01:22,770 --> 00:01:24,890
Morning Chat.
Thank you for being here,

13
00:01:24,890 --> 00:01:30,000
especially to you, Chris Vaglio,
for being one of our first in

14
00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:32,800
the live audience.
And there you go, there's some

15
00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:34,800
more people filing in.
Good morning to Greg.

16
00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:38,720
I am your host, Mark Ronick, and
on stage with me currently, we

17
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:43,760
have producer Ashley Feller, Sid
Meadows, Alex Baelish and Dr.

18
00:01:43,880 --> 00:01:46,520
Fay.
We'll see who else from the cast

19
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,640
and crew is able to join us
today.

20
00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:53,720
I know Nick is still enjoying a
vacation in Florida and I know

21
00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:57,840
Jonathan is also on vacation
officially as of yesterday, so I

22
00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:00,080
don't know what that means with
his schedule here on the

23
00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,040
podcasting morning chat.
We'll have to find out.

24
00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:07,800
And by the way, it's the eight
day countdown.

25
00:02:07,840 --> 00:02:12,160
We are on Day 8 before the
Empowered Podcasting Conference

26
00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:17,000
kicks off and still feeling
really excited about it.

27
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,720
Yes, Dr. what'd you say?
Breathe.

28
00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:20,080
Breathe.
Yes.

29
00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:21,440
Breathe.
Breathe in.

30
00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:26,440
I think, I think we are
officially all ready.

31
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:30,280
In other words, I think although
actually there's one more thing

32
00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:34,040
I have to spend some money on to
make this thing happen.

33
00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:37,560
It's those journals that we did
last year.

34
00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:42,240
We handed out to all of our
attendees, to everybody there.

35
00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:46,400
We handed out these journals
that we felt like, but we

36
00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:50,760
created them because we this was
an idea Sid shared with us last

37
00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:53,760
year at a conference.
He went to a different

38
00:02:53,760 --> 00:02:57,760
conference, not a podcasting
conference, and he noticed that

39
00:02:57,760 --> 00:03:00,560
they had hand out the people
running the event.

40
00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:04,560
We're handing out these planners
or journals, something that you

41
00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:09,560
could take notes along the way
of your journey at that

42
00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:11,520
conference.
So we wanted to adopt that.

43
00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:15,560
We thought that was a really
cool idea and I got, I brought

44
00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:21,360
in my buddy Johnny and Johnny
runs one of his side companies

45
00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:26,160
is called Lifey and they make
planners for people in general,

46
00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:28,240
not necessarily for podcasting
conference.

47
00:03:28,400 --> 00:03:31,320
They make plan planners,
journals, etcetera to really

48
00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:36,120
help you achieve all your goals.
And so we wanted to adapt what

49
00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:39,480
he does into what we wanted to
do here at the Empowered

50
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:41,120
Podcasting Conference.
So we're going to have these

51
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:44,400
journals for people to really
get the most out of the

52
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,960
workshops and presentations.
And the most favorite part that

53
00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:51,520
we discovered last year about
the journal among all of our

54
00:03:51,520 --> 00:03:54,160
attendees was the yearbook
section.

55
00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:58,360
We created a yearbook section
for people just to leave notes

56
00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:01,440
to one another, just like the
old days in high school.

57
00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:05,160
And it was a huge hit.
And so we we incorporated that

58
00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:08,400
again.
So do you have the app set up

59
00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:12,040
like, you know, the Movement
podcast Movement has that app

60
00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:15,560
and everything.
Yeah, we created with AI some

61
00:04:15,600 --> 00:04:19,240
some of these new AI apps out
there that can create mobile

62
00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:21,640
apps for you just by prompting
it.

63
00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:24,840
We do have one.
We are and it seems to be

64
00:04:24,840 --> 00:04:28,640
working.
It seems like it's solid and

65
00:04:28,640 --> 00:04:32,800
we're terrified to actually
launch it just cause who knows

66
00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:34,880
what happens once a bunch of
people are using it.

67
00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:39,440
So now this app, let's say God
forbid one of the speakers has

68
00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:41,640
lost his voice or came down
sick.

69
00:04:41,920 --> 00:04:44,960
Is this how you communicate with
everyone that OK, this

70
00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:48,400
particular class is cancelled or
there's a new speaker for the

71
00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:51,560
you have someone come in like at
the last second with something.

72
00:04:51,840 --> 00:04:53,880
Is this app the way that you
communicate that?

73
00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:55,360
Yeah, we're going to have that,
yeah.

74
00:04:55,360 --> 00:05:00,120
Any schedule changes, if any, we
will update the app in real time

75
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:02,760
so that people can see those
changes as well.

76
00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:05,480
Last year we had one or two
speakers that last minute

77
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:07,520
couldn't come.
One of them had a death in the

78
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:11,240
family.
So we had to scramble and we

79
00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:15,640
didn't have anything quick on
the fly to to let people know of

80
00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:17,160
changes and what those changes
were.

81
00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:20,160
So that's an area that we've
definitely covered.

82
00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:25,440
And at the very least, if the
mobile app fails us, we'll make

83
00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:28,560
sure the schedule is updated on
the website at

84
00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:31,840
empoweredpodcasting.com.
Thank you for asking.

85
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:36,840
So come join us in Charlotte
September 26th through the 28th,

86
00:05:36,840 --> 00:05:39,360
the weekend of International
Podcast Day.

87
00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:44,200
So if you're looking for a way
to acknowledge honor that day, I

88
00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:46,400
think this would be a wonderful
way to do it.

89
00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:49,480
All right, so here's how we're
going to do things.

90
00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:52,320
Today's a mailbag day and we
have two questions that are

91
00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:54,560
somewhat similar.
So I'm going to read them both

92
00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:57,200
to you in a moment.
And then I've got a bunch of

93
00:05:57,200 --> 00:06:02,080
questions around this idea of
potentially rebranding or

94
00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:07,320
restarting or starting anew.
But first, as some of you know

95
00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:12,280
who are regular listeners, I've
shared that our most popular

96
00:06:12,280 --> 00:06:18,000
episode by far, I'm talking 10
times the amount of downloads of

97
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:23,080
our average episodes was the one
that we did when we talked about

98
00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:28,160
Steve from Blue's Clues and the
podcast that he's starting.

99
00:06:28,200 --> 00:06:32,480
Well, the podcast has launched,
I think as of today, if not as

100
00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:37,000
of yesterday.
And he shared one clip from the

101
00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:41,680
podcast on his social media.
It captured my attention for

102
00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:44,560
multiple reasons and I want to
share it with you here.

103
00:06:44,840 --> 00:06:46,480
And then I want us to talk about
it.

104
00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:51,000
I want us to break it down.
Meaning what made it get

105
00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:57,000
somewhere around or close to
half a million views in just a

106
00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,920
matter of a couple of days?
There are some obvious reasons,

107
00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:05,080
and I think there are some
deeper reasons that we can dig

108
00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:08,600
into about the clip itself
visually.

109
00:07:08,600 --> 00:07:10,960
Obviously we're not going to be
able to really dig into it

110
00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:14,560
because this is an audio first
show, but there are lots of

111
00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:18,120
elements to it I think that we
can listen to, break down and

112
00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:20,440
learn from.
And by the way, welcome to Chris

113
00:07:20,440 --> 00:07:24,760
Baglio on the stage.
Let us let me play that clip and

114
00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:26,880
then let's talk about it on the
other side.

115
00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:32,080
Did my dog know that my dad was
dying in Hospice?

116
00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:34,920
Because it looked like he did.
I was going to say yes.

117
00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:36,440
Oh wow.
OK.

118
00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:38,560
I think so.
Again, like I think it depends

119
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:41,080
on who you talk to, right?
But from my experience.

120
00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:43,880
Animals know what's up.
Yeah, I walked into the room

121
00:07:43,880 --> 00:07:45,800
and.
I was like, oh.

122
00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:47,720
This looks different.
Things look different today.

123
00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:52,160
And then the Hospice nurse was
like, yeah, yeah, this is

124
00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:53,800
happening.
And I said, go, what do you

125
00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:56,080
think?
Like, you know, days, hours, you

126
00:07:56,080 --> 00:07:56,920
know, like what do you think
she's?

127
00:07:56,920 --> 00:07:59,200
Like, I don't know.
Watch the dog.

128
00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:02,080
The dog will know.
Apparently just two hours before

129
00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:07,080
he passed, my dog woke up as if
he had heard something and went

130
00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:12,680
over and nuzzled my dad's hand.
And my dad hadn't moved in days.

131
00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:16,440
And my dad, his hand, woke up
and petted my dog.

132
00:08:16,520 --> 00:08:17,880
God, this is that story even
now.

133
00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:22,240
But it seemed like he knew.
I like to think he did.

134
00:08:22,440 --> 00:08:24,040
I like to think he said goodbye,
you know?

135
00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:28,120
I've seen so many amazing things
with with dogs and cats, with

136
00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:31,000
the with the owners where like
they'll take off symptoms,

137
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:34,400
they'll protect the the their
loved one, they'll sleep under

138
00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,000
the bed, they'll sleep on the
bed continuously.

139
00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:40,000
They'll.
Howl when someone dies like

140
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:41,159
it's?
Just intense.

141
00:08:41,159 --> 00:08:42,880
It's just intense that I just
feel like.

142
00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:46,920
Dogs.
I love dogs.

143
00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:53,680
There is Steve Burns from his
new podcast Alive with Steve

144
00:08:53,680 --> 00:08:56,120
Burns.
The name of that show is really

145
00:08:56,120 --> 00:08:59,360
a playoff of there was a rumor a
while back that he had passed

146
00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:04,280
away and so he had come back to
social media at some point.

147
00:09:04,280 --> 00:09:05,760
No, I'm still here.
I'm alive.

148
00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:08,320
So that's become a thing for
him.

149
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:13,040
And the show has, as he's
explained it, as we've explained

150
00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:18,000
it in past episodes, his show is
really geared toward his old

151
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:22,440
audience from when he was a
children television show host.

152
00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:28,000
It's now for those young adults
and really talking about the

153
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,600
things that they're going to be
curious about, interested in

154
00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:36,160
talking about today, things like
death, things like depression,

155
00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:40,240
things like sex.
He wants to reconnect with that

156
00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:42,840
audience.
And clearly from that clip, I

157
00:09:42,840 --> 00:09:47,040
would say that's, you know, he's
on point with what he's at least

158
00:09:47,040 --> 00:09:50,080
attempting to do here.
And I wanted to first point out

159
00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:54,080
before we evaluate the clip, I
wanted to point out, first of

160
00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:59,680
all, the guest, I believe was a,
is a Hospice care person.

161
00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:06,720
And I wanted to point out that
her audio was kind of crappy,

162
00:10:07,160 --> 00:10:08,280
right?
Clearly she didn't have a

163
00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:10,960
microphone or at least a, a
studio microphone.

164
00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:12,360
Dr. Did you want to respond to
that?

165
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:16,480
Yeah, and I thought the music
behind it was too loud.

166
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:19,920
The music that was too loud and
heard.

167
00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:22,760
Yeah.
And that kind of pisses me off

168
00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:28,680
because that is easily fixable.
That's so easily fixable.

169
00:10:28,800 --> 00:10:32,480
Even with AI tools that are
available like a phonic and

170
00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:35,440
Adobe podcasts.
Exactly, exactly.

171
00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:39,640
So to have them not run that
through something that has

172
00:10:39,640 --> 00:10:45,240
become like an everyday cool for
us, it's a little bit

173
00:10:45,240 --> 00:10:49,440
infuriating and distracting.
Distracting for me because I

174
00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:52,920
know it could be better.
The music was a little too loud

175
00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:54,680
for me.
It got in the way of me

176
00:10:54,680 --> 00:10:56,800
listening.
OK, so I didn't connect with

177
00:10:56,800 --> 00:10:59,240
that with the music.
Like I definitely noticed the

178
00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:02,640
music, don't get me wrong.
And as long I think for me, as

179
00:11:02,640 --> 00:11:05,320
long as I can really hear the
people talking clearly, it

180
00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:08,040
doesn't.
It's not a distraction, but I

181
00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:10,160
could see how that could
distract other people.

182
00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:12,560
And this is the big thing for
me.

183
00:11:13,040 --> 00:11:15,240
As far as what you were just
pointing out, Dr. And you said

184
00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:17,520
something, I'll paraphrase it
because I don't remember it by

185
00:11:17,520 --> 00:11:21,640
word by word.
But this whole idea that, you

186
00:11:21,640 --> 00:11:25,560
know, it could be better.
And as a podcaster and as a

187
00:11:25,560 --> 00:11:28,240
podcast producer, editor, yeah,
of course.

188
00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:32,600
But the real question is, does
the audience really care?

189
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:37,400
Because yes, we know that there
are studies that say if you have

190
00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:41,560
bad audio, it's a top reason why
people might stop listening to

191
00:11:41,560 --> 00:11:45,280
your show.
I don't know if I consider that

192
00:11:45,280 --> 00:11:49,000
or if a general audience
considers that bad audio,

193
00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:53,120
especially these days where so
many of us are doing video

194
00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:57,760
conferencing, where not
everybody has a studio mic.

195
00:11:57,760 --> 00:11:59,760
They're just using the mic from
their computer.

196
00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:04,920
So I think sometimes it's just
my opinion and sometimes I think

197
00:12:04,920 --> 00:12:09,800
that we as podcasters, as
podcast professionals, we're

198
00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:15,360
quick to judge the audio quality
like the one we just heard and

199
00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:18,880
we don't stop and think, but
does this affect the audience?

200
00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:22,320
Will they care?
I see several people want to

201
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:24,440
chime in.
Sid, good morning to you and

202
00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:27,920
great catching up with you.
Yesterday afternoon it was was

203
00:12:27,920 --> 00:12:30,280
long overdue and great.
I think we talked for like 90

204
00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:33,080
minutes and we just, as they
say, shot the S.

205
00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:36,400
It was great catching up Sid and
I want to do that more with a

206
00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:39,440
lot of you here on the
podcasting morning chat.

207
00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:42,480
It reminded me after the show it
it's good to catch up with

208
00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:44,440
everybody.
So, Sid, anyway, what did you

209
00:12:44,440 --> 00:12:47,200
want to add to this part of the
conversation about quote UN

210
00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:49,720
quote bad audio?
Good morning everybody.

211
00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:51,840
And yes, Mark, I agree, it was
great to catch up with you too.

212
00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,520
And you can do it more often as
I send a message to you.

213
00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:59,000
Just from my perspective, I, I
was just listening to the

214
00:12:59,880 --> 00:13:01,960
trailer that you played or the
clip that you played.

215
00:13:01,960 --> 00:13:05,800
And I listen to it as a
listener, not a podcast

216
00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:08,560
professional, not a producer.
And I didn't pick up any of

217
00:13:08,560 --> 00:13:11,040
those things that Dr. said.
Not that it's right or wrong,

218
00:13:11,040 --> 00:13:13,880
but I heard the music.
I thought the music was nice.

219
00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:17,120
I did notice her sound was a
little different than his.

220
00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:20,960
But again, I mean, as an active
consumerist my that listens to

221
00:13:20,960 --> 00:13:26,200
probably 3 to 5 podcasts a day,
I just didn't notice anything

222
00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:29,080
that would make me, from an
audio perspective, make me want

223
00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:31,560
to tune away from it at all.
I was more paying attention to

224
00:13:31,560 --> 00:13:34,800
the actual content itself and
talking about the dog and the

225
00:13:34,800 --> 00:13:37,360
actions of the dog and those
kinds of things.

226
00:13:37,360 --> 00:13:39,640
So I mean, I thought it was a
beautiful clip and I didn't, as

227
00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:41,800
a listener, I didn't notice any
of those things.

228
00:13:42,360 --> 00:13:43,280
Thank you, Sid.
Yeah.

229
00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:45,800
And I think yeah, to that's to
my point, right.

230
00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:50,200
I think that sometimes we can be
really sensitive to it, but I

231
00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:56,360
think if the content is strong,
I also believe that if the host

232
00:13:56,360 --> 00:14:01,680
has great audio, which in this
clip he does, he's using assure

233
00:14:01,680 --> 00:14:04,200
microphone.
I think he's using an MV7.

234
00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:07,080
I'm looking at it here.
It might be it may actually be

235
00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:10,040
an SM7B, but he's got the good
microphone.

236
00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:13,440
He sounds good and I that's
something that I tell my clients

237
00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:15,840
sometimes, right?
Like if they have a guest they

238
00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:19,360
really want on the show and that
guest only has their computer

239
00:14:19,360 --> 00:14:21,720
microphone, they know this in
advance and they'll come to me

240
00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:25,720
and say, Mark, what do I do?
Do I tell the the guest no go.

241
00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:29,680
And I say to them it, well,
first of all, as long as we've

242
00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:34,400
got your good audio, I'm happy.
And secondly, can they be heard

243
00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:36,760
clearly?
If it's if it's just a matter of

244
00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:39,560
there's a, there's some echo
because of the room environment,

245
00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:42,440
we can live with it.
Would I prefer them to have a

246
00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:44,400
studio mic?
100%.

247
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:48,000
I would much rather them have
clean, crisp audio.

248
00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:52,800
But if you can conduct a
conversation, if the guests can

249
00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:58,160
be heard clearly and the content
is strong, I think you're fine.

250
00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:02,280
And I know Sid is wanting one
example of that, and I believe

251
00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:04,800
that there are others.
Dr. What did you want to add to

252
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:06,760
this?
Real quick, before I go to the

253
00:15:06,760 --> 00:15:11,440
kitchen, I'm going to give a
show that you produce a plug and

254
00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:15,240
I also edit it.
So if you listen back-to-back to

255
00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:19,720
a show called Dementia
Discussions and then this show

256
00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:24,680
and you strictly rate it on the
sound it, there's just kind of a

257
00:15:24,680 --> 00:15:28,720
subliminal feeling of it's more
intimate.

258
00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:33,120
It's two people talking at a
table when there's a bunch of,

259
00:15:33,560 --> 00:15:38,000
you know, a bunch of stuff going
on in the restaurant, but two

260
00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:41,760
people are like, so into this
conversation and they're talking

261
00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:46,000
to each other.
And you go to this clip with

262
00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:49,200
Steve Burns.
It's a different feeling.

263
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:51,680
It doesn't feel as intimate,
especially something that is

264
00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:55,880
heavy as a topic as this.
So I just think it's a

265
00:15:55,880 --> 00:15:58,600
subliminal thing.
I'm with you there.

266
00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:02,840
I think that it does create a
better environment for your

267
00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:05,880
audience, a better atmosphere
for your audience.

268
00:16:05,880 --> 00:16:10,400
If everybody's got the
professional studio sound, I am

269
00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:13,520
totally with you.
Also, Lynn, let's assume that

270
00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:17,080
that music that's playing in the
clip is specifically for the

271
00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:19,280
clip.
I know you didn't necessarily

272
00:16:19,280 --> 00:16:21,800
say differently, but I just
wanted to call that out.

273
00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,120
Like, I think that music, it's
just for the clip itself, not I

274
00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:27,120
don't think he's playing it
throughout the whole show.

275
00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:31,000
I'll have to go back and listen.
Anything about this clip to you

276
00:16:31,080 --> 00:16:35,320
that makes it stand out?
What makes this clip so

277
00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:39,320
compelling?
Obviously, visually, I think the

278
00:16:39,320 --> 00:16:44,360
hook is for people who follow
Steve or know who Steve Burns

279
00:16:44,360 --> 00:16:47,000
is.
Just seeing him on the screen as

280
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,360
the first thing that they see
might make them stop, right?

281
00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:54,440
And what was that first line?
Let's hear that first line again

282
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:57,280
of what he said because I think
that this in itself is also a

283
00:16:57,280 --> 00:16:58,760
strong hook.
Let's play it.

284
00:16:59,080 --> 00:17:04,079
Did my dog know that my dad was
dying in Hospice?

285
00:17:04,599 --> 00:17:07,920
So there you go.
That to me, very strong, very

286
00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:12,839
strong opening line that's going
to stop a lot of people.

287
00:17:13,839 --> 00:17:18,960
And even the way that he's
talking, he he uses a slower

288
00:17:18,960 --> 00:17:22,599
pace, which I can appreciate
because I know that I speak a

289
00:17:22,680 --> 00:17:26,599
little bit slower than say,
maybe the average podcaster.

290
00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:31,000
And I think that in his case,
it's really effective the way

291
00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:35,000
that he pauses, you know, did my
dog No.

292
00:17:35,280 --> 00:17:38,960
And then there was just this
quick little pause that really

293
00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:43,640
set the stage for me that my dad
was dying.

294
00:17:44,080 --> 00:17:46,680
That is powerful.
That's going to make a lot of

295
00:17:46,680 --> 00:17:50,200
people stop the scroll.
Anything else?

296
00:17:50,360 --> 00:17:53,680
I'm just curious because I think
that this can be a really big

297
00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:56,720
learning moment for a lot of us
when we're putting together

298
00:17:56,800 --> 00:18:00,400
podcast clips.
Did anything else stand out to

299
00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:03,640
you or what might make people
share this clip?

300
00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:08,240
Ashley's giving me texts because
I think her voice is still a

301
00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:10,600
little shot from being under the
weather.

302
00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:14,680
She says reason one, Strip the
strong hook.

303
00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:17,560
Yep.
Like I was saying, 2, Dog

304
00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:20,080
content in general.
Yeah, I think when you're

305
00:18:20,080 --> 00:18:24,040
talking about dogs that will
absolutely attract an audience.

306
00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:29,360
3, The visual aspect. 4, The
guest has a lot of followers on

307
00:18:29,360 --> 00:18:31,440
TikTok, and so does he, for that
matter.

308
00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:33,040
Ashley.
Yeah.

309
00:18:33,360 --> 00:18:36,920
And I want to pile on to the dog
content, which I know this isn't

310
00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:40,760
something that necessarily we
can adopt, but the dude is known

311
00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:44,080
for dogs.
Blue was a dog.

312
00:18:44,760 --> 00:18:49,680
So when he starts a clip as
Steve saying, does my did my dog

313
00:18:49,680 --> 00:18:52,520
know that's also going to
attract his audience?

314
00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:55,720
So I think the lesson there is
think about your audience and

315
00:18:55,720 --> 00:18:59,240
what connects them to you.
Playoff of that.

316
00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:02,400
I was just going to say real
quick, all of Ashley's points,

317
00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:03,960
but it's it's very relatable,
right?

318
00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:08,120
Like anybody who hears that can
at some point have a very

319
00:19:08,120 --> 00:19:10,960
similar experience.
And that's The thing is like

320
00:19:10,960 --> 00:19:15,760
it's telling a story that a lot
of people can you don't have

321
00:19:15,760 --> 00:19:19,280
that like kindred relationship
to in the sense of like, Oh,

322
00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:22,800
I've been through that or I know
somebody who's gone through

323
00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:24,640
that.
And so it's like a shared human

324
00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:27,160
experience, you know?
And so those kinds of pieces of

325
00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:30,800
content always do really well
because it's very relatable, you

326
00:19:30,800 --> 00:19:32,080
know?
And so that's the thing that

327
00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:35,120
when you go, wow, why did this
perform really well or why was

328
00:19:35,120 --> 00:19:36,720
this?
Because a lot of times it's just

329
00:19:36,720 --> 00:19:39,480
that shared experience that a
lot of people have had in a

330
00:19:39,480 --> 00:19:43,600
similar situation usually is the
reason why something kind of

331
00:19:43,600 --> 00:19:46,320
takes off like that.
And that little clip there, like

332
00:19:46,320 --> 00:19:49,680
for me, you know, I'm a dog
person and, you know, instantly

333
00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:51,320
I'm like gravitated towards
that.

334
00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:54,440
But like the story itself, like
it's just very relatable.

335
00:19:54,520 --> 00:19:57,280
You know, you've you've heard
those stories before And and for

336
00:19:57,280 --> 00:19:59,160
some people, they have
experienced that.

337
00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:03,080
So yeah, that's just another
thing that I think is why a clip

338
00:20:03,080 --> 00:20:04,600
like that works really well.
Yeah.

339
00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:08,480
That relatability is so such a
great point, Chris.

340
00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:11,920
Thank you.
Because look, we I identified

341
00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:15,640
for you at the beginning of when
we played this clip that his

342
00:20:15,640 --> 00:20:17,800
audience, he knows his audience,
right?

343
00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:22,680
But this clip is so relatable,
it can connect with a much

344
00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:27,840
broader audience than his right?
Because like you said, if you're

345
00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:30,360
a dog lover, it's going to
probably make you stop.

346
00:20:30,960 --> 00:20:33,840
And then if you listen to just a
little bit longer, it's like,

347
00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:39,280
wow, did this dog actually know
that Steve's dad was passing

348
00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:42,400
away?
That's going to capture a a

349
00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:45,280
larger audience and I think
that's also something we as

350
00:20:45,280 --> 00:20:48,640
podcasters can think about when
we're choosing clips from our

351
00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:52,000
long form content.
Can this be relatable?

352
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:57,000
Can this be of interest to a
wider audience?

353
00:20:57,000 --> 00:21:01,760
Because if so, you're increasing
your chances of virality, if you

354
00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,640
will, or at the very least,
you're just extending your reach

355
00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:07,760
or increasing chances of
extending your reach.

356
00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:11,480
Rez is on stage.
Good morning again, Rez.

357
00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:13,080
Welcome back.
What did you want to add to

358
00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:14,840
this?
Good morning, Mark.

359
00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:18,040
It's similar to like DJ ING.
Like if you're DJ ING for an

360
00:21:18,040 --> 00:21:22,120
audience that are not DJ's,
they're not going to necessarily

361
00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:25,720
always pick up on those
technical things.

362
00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:29,680
I think the mic, for example, is
not that much of an issue for

363
00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:33,360
the average listener.
Yeah, I'm with you there, Rez.

364
00:21:33,360 --> 00:21:36,640
I know that some people might
disagree, but yeah, I I'm with

365
00:21:36,640 --> 00:21:37,680
you there.
Alex.

366
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:40,640
Did you want to add something?
I want to kind of go off of what

367
00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:43,760
Rez said.
This goes back to knowing how to

368
00:21:43,760 --> 00:21:47,160
be a good guest.
It's acceptable to have the

369
00:21:47,160 --> 00:21:51,400
computer thing going on.
And you see it on CNN.

370
00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:53,000
You see people with their
headset and everything.

371
00:21:53,360 --> 00:21:56,720
But it's not a big deal in terms
of the content itself.

372
00:21:56,720 --> 00:22:00,320
Yeah, it's a lot of boxes.
And he also is an actor, so he

373
00:22:00,320 --> 00:22:03,400
knows that he knows how to bring
an audience in.

374
00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:05,200
Yeah.
He just had a commotion.

375
00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:08,760
Yeah, for me, I'm not a dog
lover, so I just have my own

376
00:22:08,760 --> 00:22:11,000
problem with with Steve's.
It's not for me.

377
00:22:11,120 --> 00:22:13,920
Like the point is, is like what
we always say, you know, there's

378
00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:17,320
somebody for everybody and not
everyone's going to resonate

379
00:22:17,320 --> 00:22:18,360
with everyone.
Yeah.

380
00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:22,120
The thing that kind of bothers
me in general about these type

381
00:22:22,120 --> 00:22:25,080
of clips is, you know, people
take the time to do this and

382
00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,560
maybe I'm being a podcast snob
when I say it, but have a good

383
00:22:28,560 --> 00:22:30,920
mic.
I mean, I don't have a bad mic,

384
00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:33,200
you know what I mean?
And if you're going to be on a

385
00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:37,080
show that you know is going to
have a big following, try to put

386
00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:38,560
your best foot forward.
That's all I'm saying.

387
00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:42,480
It is what it is.
Well, this guest was a this

388
00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:44,960
guest is a is a Hospice
caregiver.

389
00:22:45,520 --> 00:22:49,000
I know I'm I'm over criticizing.
No, you're not like Dr. was on

390
00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:52,240
the same page as you.
To some people, it's a hotspot.

391
00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:56,200
And again, I think that as
podcasters, it's been so drilled

392
00:22:56,200 --> 00:22:59,960
in our heads that we have to
have high quality, good

393
00:22:59,960 --> 00:23:03,680
microphones, etcetera.
I think that sometimes I'm not

394
00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:06,560
saying him on a high quality
expensive mic because Amanda put

395
00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:08,520
in the chat.
You don't need to expect a guest

396
00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:11,480
to have expensive mic if you're
going to be on a podcast.

397
00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:14,920
It's like anything else.
If you're going to do this for

398
00:23:15,400 --> 00:23:20,720
more than one time, you can get
a very inexpensive mic $2030

399
00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:22,080
mic.
For.

400
00:23:22,080 --> 00:23:25,280
Cheap and it sounds great.
No one's beating you up about

401
00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:27,520
it.
I know that of some podcasters

402
00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:32,760
with good budgets that actually
send microphones to their

403
00:23:32,760 --> 00:23:35,040
guests.
If they don't have one, they'll

404
00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:38,120
find out ahead of time and they
actually spend the money on

405
00:23:38,120 --> 00:23:41,280
sending them a mic.
Some of them even have it set up

406
00:23:41,280 --> 00:23:45,120
to such an art form, such a
science that they even get the

407
00:23:45,120 --> 00:23:48,240
guests to send back the mics
when they're done with them.

408
00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:52,000
But by the way, I also wanted to
point out something about this

409
00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:55,240
clip.
This is an example of the host

410
00:23:55,320 --> 00:24:00,040
sharing their own story and not
always putting the guest in the

411
00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:02,480
spotlight.
This is something that we've

412
00:24:02,480 --> 00:24:06,880
talked about very recently, you
know, whether or not the host

413
00:24:07,680 --> 00:24:10,840
should button up and just, you
know, put their their guest in

414
00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:14,040
the spotlight the whole time or
should it be balanced

415
00:24:14,040 --> 00:24:17,840
conversation, etcetera.
Well, this is an example of

416
00:24:17,840 --> 00:24:21,840
making that kind of thing work.
Making it work where you inject

417
00:24:21,880 --> 00:24:26,160
yourself, your stories into the
conversation and still not

418
00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:28,000
necessarily hog the
conversation.

419
00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:33,400
Your audience, I believes, wants
to hear you and your insights.

420
00:24:34,120 --> 00:24:38,040
By the way, I feel very special
now when I noticed that on

421
00:24:38,040 --> 00:24:41,880
stage, we have both Chris and
Amanda together on stage now

422
00:24:41,880 --> 00:24:46,040
that we know they are no longer
doing song swap showdown

423
00:24:46,040 --> 00:24:48,360
together.
Chris still running it now with

424
00:24:48,360 --> 00:24:50,600
his wife.
And of course, we know that

425
00:24:50,600 --> 00:24:53,080
they're still the best of
friends here.

426
00:24:53,280 --> 00:24:56,200
But it's cold still nonetheless
to have you both on stage.

427
00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:58,360
And I'm just going to stop for a
second and say good morning to

428
00:24:58,360 --> 00:24:59,560
you.
Amanda Sharp, how are you?

429
00:25:00,280 --> 00:25:01,960
Good morning.
And it's equally as special to

430
00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:04,360
me when we're on the stage
together as well.

431
00:25:04,640 --> 00:25:07,920
But make no mistake, Chris and I
still behind the scenes talk a

432
00:25:07,920 --> 00:25:13,640
ton cuz I love him so.
Much and Amanda you now we've

433
00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:17,680
shared one of the last times you
joined us you are stepping away

434
00:25:17,680 --> 00:25:21,240
from podcasting specifically but
not creating content because you

435
00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:25,600
are all in on TikTok and I know
you've this is somewhat of a

436
00:25:25,600 --> 00:25:29,640
good segue but I know you've you
know with this pivot you're

437
00:25:30,040 --> 00:25:33,720
you're shifting a little bit of
the content that you make not

438
00:25:33,720 --> 00:25:37,600
entirely but I know your big
focus now is really using your

439
00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:42,400
TikTok content to help promote
your town your store in your

440
00:25:42,400 --> 00:25:45,560
town etcetera.
So how is that whole thing going

441
00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:49,840
you?
Know really fabulous I believed

442
00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:52,440
in this years ago and I just
feel like I'm finally to the

443
00:25:52,440 --> 00:25:55,800
point where my hard work is
paying off Sid and I actually

444
00:25:55,800 --> 00:26:00,240
had a conversation this past
week about it and it's just if

445
00:26:00,240 --> 00:26:03,680
you don't have the endurance to
wait out how long it takes to

446
00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:06,920
actually kind of see some
intentional growth like things

447
00:26:06,920 --> 00:26:10,040
that I did two years ago I feel
like are just on autopilot now

448
00:26:10,040 --> 00:26:13,080
and it feels really good if I'm
being honest like I don't have

449
00:26:13,080 --> 00:26:17,240
to work so hard I'm putting in
the work but my brain doesn't

450
00:26:17,240 --> 00:26:19,080
have to work so hard if that
makes sense.

451
00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:23,680
Yeah, I think it sounds like
it's becoming more like a reflex

452
00:26:23,680 --> 00:26:26,640
than a thought process because
you're you've kind of figured

453
00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:29,120
out how you're approaching your
content.

454
00:26:29,840 --> 00:26:32,440
I don't know how to explain it.
I guess the work that I've put

455
00:26:32,440 --> 00:26:35,720
in now is showing up, you know
where customers are coming in

456
00:26:35,720 --> 00:26:38,760
because they might not need me
right away or they might not be

457
00:26:38,760 --> 00:26:41,560
able to go to the event right
away, but the next time around

458
00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:44,840
they are.
So I feel like I'm officially on

459
00:26:44,840 --> 00:26:48,920
the map, not just me as a
creator, but my little town, and

460
00:26:48,920 --> 00:26:52,520
we all are reaping the benefits
and that feels amazing.

461
00:26:53,240 --> 00:26:56,760
I love it and I love there.
That's such a key point is

462
00:26:56,760 --> 00:26:59,520
really understanding your
purpose for why you're creating

463
00:26:59,520 --> 00:27:03,920
content, because if it's just to
make money, just to get follows

464
00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:07,400
and views, that's going to be,
it's going to start feeling like

465
00:27:07,400 --> 00:27:11,080
that grind, right.
But but if you have some other

466
00:27:11,080 --> 00:27:13,520
goals in mind, what you want to
get out of this.

467
00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:17,400
And in your case, yeah, I think
that it's a great example of

468
00:27:17,560 --> 00:27:20,920
having focus and and intention.
Absolutely.

469
00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:23,040
And if this would have been 20
years ago, this wouldn't have

470
00:27:23,040 --> 00:27:25,440
been an option.
And to think of what I would

471
00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:30,520
have had 20 years ago to get the
Ida on the map, this tiny little

472
00:27:30,520 --> 00:27:32,520
town, it would have been nearly
impossible.

473
00:27:32,920 --> 00:27:36,520
But in this very connected
world, there's people all over

474
00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:39,280
the world that now know of this
little town called Ida.

475
00:27:39,280 --> 00:27:42,640
And I just, that's so special.
So special congratulations

476
00:27:42,640 --> 00:27:47,080
Amanda, and we will put a link
to Amanda's TikTok in the show

477
00:27:47,080 --> 00:27:49,400
notes if you want to follow her
journey.

478
00:27:49,400 --> 00:27:54,080
If you're not already, let's
open up the mailbag with Sid,

479
00:27:54,640 --> 00:27:57,720
who as I had shared with you
all, Sid had.

480
00:27:57,960 --> 00:28:00,640
Sid and I had a call yesterday
just to catch up.

481
00:28:01,080 --> 00:28:03,760
And when we started the call, we
were talking a little bit about

482
00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:06,920
his website.
So Sid, would you share, share a

483
00:28:06,920 --> 00:28:09,000
little bit with everybody what
we were talking about so we can

484
00:28:09,000 --> 00:28:11,960
set this up properly?
On Monday of this week, I

485
00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:16,720
decided to go and look at my
analytics in Kajabi, which is a

486
00:28:16,720 --> 00:28:18,320
platform that I use for my
website.

487
00:28:18,600 --> 00:28:21,280
And I have not looked at them
and I don't know, probably a

488
00:28:21,280 --> 00:28:24,720
couple of years, not really sure
why I chose to go look at them,

489
00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:32,200
but I did and I was blown away.
And so then I went to Google

490
00:28:32,200 --> 00:28:36,640
Analytics and look at Google
Analytics and to some degree it

491
00:28:37,240 --> 00:28:41,000
mimicked what Kajabi had to say.
I went and asked Kajabi's

492
00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:43,360
Facebook groups and Kajabi
Heroes in the Facebook group

493
00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:46,360
about the download, about the
downloads, excuse me, about the

494
00:28:46,360 --> 00:28:48,440
views, page views and stuff like
that, just to get a little bit

495
00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:52,200
of clarity on it.
But basically if I kind of do

496
00:28:52,200 --> 00:28:58,680
the math, my head website is
getting about 10,000 people a

497
00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:00,520
month to visit it.
Nice.

498
00:29:00,680 --> 00:29:04,600
And I was like, what the heck,
10,000 people come into my

499
00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:08,040
website, like what do they want?
But the thing I noticed through

500
00:29:08,040 --> 00:29:10,480
the analytics is they're
bouncing really quickly.

501
00:29:11,080 --> 00:29:14,840
And so the average time is 11
seconds.

502
00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:18,000
And so I thought, OK, I was
talking to a marketing friend of

503
00:29:18,000 --> 00:29:20,320
mine like, OK, what do I, what
do I need to do here?

504
00:29:20,320 --> 00:29:22,280
Like they're coming to the
website.

505
00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:24,480
They are bouncing faster than I
want them to.

506
00:29:25,080 --> 00:29:26,640
Maybe it's time to update the
website.

507
00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:29,920
Maybe it's time to, you know,
look at putting products on the

508
00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:32,160
website that you can buy because
there's nothing that you can buy

509
00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:34,080
on the website.
So why are these people coming?

510
00:29:34,080 --> 00:29:38,560
And then I dove a little deeper
and I looked at my last podcast

511
00:29:38,560 --> 00:29:47,120
episode, which was 164, and I
noticed that that page had 896

512
00:29:47,120 --> 00:29:51,240
views.
Then I went to Bus Sprout and it

513
00:29:51,240 --> 00:29:56,720
has 100 listens and I was like,
OK, this is interesting. 896

514
00:29:56,720 --> 00:30:01,280
people landed on that page, but
I don't have 896 plays of that

515
00:30:01,280 --> 00:30:04,440
podcast, right?
So there's something here that

516
00:30:04,440 --> 00:30:09,360
we've got to figure out to do to
get people to encourage people

517
00:30:09,360 --> 00:30:12,680
to click the play buttons.
So I was sharing with Mark kind

518
00:30:12,680 --> 00:30:16,840
of the exploratory journey that
I'm on of trying to understand

519
00:30:16,840 --> 00:30:19,800
this and you know where I'm
going with it and what I want to

520
00:30:19,800 --> 00:30:21,720
do next.
So, Mark, I'll leave it to you

521
00:30:21,720 --> 00:30:23,840
to ask me whatever follow up you
want to ask me.

522
00:30:23,880 --> 00:30:26,880
Yeah, well, what I'm going to do
is 1st, I'm going to share a

523
00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:32,440
link to the previous episode, to
the one you mentioned, episode

524
00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:35,160
163.
And I'm sharing this so that you

525
00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:39,920
can all see what the web page
looked like prior to some

526
00:30:39,920 --> 00:30:43,120
changes Sid made.
OK, so and this was.

527
00:30:43,120 --> 00:30:46,480
Last night, like after I had the
phone with Mark, I called my

528
00:30:46,800 --> 00:30:48,960
podcast editor, was talking to
her about some of the things

529
00:30:48,960 --> 00:30:52,080
that Mark noticed on the page
and I'm taking notes on and

530
00:30:52,240 --> 00:30:54,840
giving me some insights.
And so I called her and she and

531
00:30:54,840 --> 00:30:59,160
I workshopped literally live.
I'm making changes in Kajabi to

532
00:30:59,160 --> 00:31:00,600
see what we could do.
So go ahead, Mark.

533
00:31:01,160 --> 00:31:07,840
Yeah, so if you take a look at
Syd's page here for episode 163,

534
00:31:08,600 --> 00:31:12,120
you'll see he's got the big
logo, the trend report logo on

535
00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:16,280
one side of the page, and then
immediately next to it, the

536
00:31:16,280 --> 00:31:20,640
episode cover image as well.
You can see the graphic.

537
00:31:20,640 --> 00:31:24,320
And the the first thing that I
thought about, you know, looking

538
00:31:24,320 --> 00:31:26,720
at the page, 'cause I wanted to
investigate and figure out.

539
00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:29,120
OK, yeah, good point.
Sid, you've got almost 900

540
00:31:29,120 --> 00:31:33,520
people that landed on that page.
Why only 100 listens?

541
00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:36,600
Why didn't they even press play
to hear the first minute?

542
00:31:37,520 --> 00:31:40,880
And what I feel like and what
this is an experiment, we'll

543
00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:43,640
have to see.
But I feel like what's happening

544
00:31:43,640 --> 00:31:48,280
here is that the graphics at the
top of the page are so big, it

545
00:31:48,280 --> 00:31:53,520
pushes the player down the page.
So I think when somebody lands

546
00:31:53,520 --> 00:31:58,680
on it, they may not go below, as
they say, below the fold, the

547
00:31:58,680 --> 00:32:03,040
old newspaper term, right?
So I wanted to see, let's see

548
00:32:03,040 --> 00:32:06,400
what happens if we take the
player and move it up up to the

549
00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:09,960
top or make it much more visible
at the top of the page so that

550
00:32:09,960 --> 00:32:15,680
the user has no issue or doesn't
doesn't have to scroll to go

551
00:32:15,680 --> 00:32:19,040
find more.
Because let's face it, if an

552
00:32:19,040 --> 00:32:21,960
average podcast listener,
somebody who may be casually

553
00:32:21,960 --> 00:32:26,320
listens to podcasts, I should
say, they may not interact

554
00:32:26,320 --> 00:32:28,160
enough with it.
They may just see the graphics

555
00:32:28,160 --> 00:32:31,800
and just think, OK, that's,
that's the episode, right?

556
00:32:31,800 --> 00:32:36,560
So I want to just spoon feed the
content to an audience.

557
00:32:37,040 --> 00:32:42,880
So if you go now to
sidmeadows.com/episode 164, you

558
00:32:42,880 --> 00:32:47,600
can see that he's made a change.
He's got the title big at the

559
00:32:47,600 --> 00:32:52,200
top, but the player doesn't get
pushed down the page.

560
00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:56,120
It's the first thing you see
right after you see the main

561
00:32:56,120 --> 00:33:00,320
title of the episode.
Billy has come up on stage now.

562
00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:06,160
This could go really well where
Billy could be really giving it

563
00:33:06,160 --> 00:33:07,560
to Sid.
Let's find out.

564
00:33:07,560 --> 00:33:11,440
Good morning, Billy.
Sid, you Boomer, what are you

565
00:33:11,440 --> 00:33:14,440
doing now?
Well, one thing and this will do

566
00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:18,280
from a broadcast consumer
standpoint, is when I go to

567
00:33:18,280 --> 00:33:22,200
someone's website, I never
listen to the player for a

568
00:33:22,200 --> 00:33:24,680
couple of reasons.
One, I typically have to have

569
00:33:24,680 --> 00:33:27,880
that web page open, especially
if I'm using my phone, which I'm

570
00:33:28,040 --> 00:33:30,880
typically always AM.
I will have to like keep that

571
00:33:30,880 --> 00:33:34,520
page open for the player to work
on some people's platforms.

572
00:33:34,920 --> 00:33:39,080
So what I'm looking for is like,
what do you have an Apple little

573
00:33:39,080 --> 00:33:40,920
play button there?
Do you have Spotify?

574
00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:45,040
Like do you have the platform
that I want to use on your

575
00:33:45,040 --> 00:33:47,560
website?
And if you don't, I'm probably

576
00:33:47,560 --> 00:33:51,720
not going to listen to it just
because it's inconvenient for me

577
00:33:51,720 --> 00:33:54,160
to have to keep that.
And that might not be.

578
00:33:54,160 --> 00:33:56,320
True for your.
Player, but that's I've seen

579
00:33:56,320 --> 00:34:00,440
that with a lot of other players
on websites like it doesn't work

580
00:34:00,440 --> 00:34:04,320
unless I'm on that tab or on
that that the app open or

581
00:34:04,320 --> 00:34:06,760
whatever.
So that's why I typically bounce

582
00:34:06,760 --> 00:34:09,880
just for, you know, consumer
inside there.

583
00:34:10,600 --> 00:34:12,880
So Billy, that point really well
taken.

584
00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:16,239
There is not a link to Apple or
Spotify.

585
00:34:16,639 --> 00:34:20,000
It doesn't even tell you on that
particular landing page where

586
00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:23,520
you can go listen to it.
However, when I look at my bus

587
00:34:23,520 --> 00:34:28,199
brought analytics, Apple is my
number one place people listen.

588
00:34:28,199 --> 00:34:33,120
And my second and third place
people listen are the embedded

589
00:34:33,480 --> 00:34:37,600
#2 is the embedded web player
says people going to the website

590
00:34:38,040 --> 00:34:40,600
and clicking play.
And then the other is is what

591
00:34:40,600 --> 00:34:43,800
Brusberg calls web viewer.
So they're viewing it through a

592
00:34:43,800 --> 00:34:47,679
web browser somewhere and also
clicking whether that web

593
00:34:47,679 --> 00:34:53,040
browser is there either clicking
the player or they're listening

594
00:34:53,040 --> 00:34:56,960
through a web browser like on
Apple or some other listening

595
00:34:56,960 --> 00:34:58,880
platform where they listen
through a web player.

596
00:34:58,880 --> 00:35:03,080
Semi analytics say Apple
embedded player and then website

597
00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:05,640
are my top three locations
people listen.

598
00:35:06,240 --> 00:35:08,400
Does it show you what device
says?

599
00:35:08,440 --> 00:35:11,040
Like if are those people
listening on desktop or they

600
00:35:11,080 --> 00:35:14,040
listening on mobile or?
Mobile, yes, but the two don't.

601
00:35:14,280 --> 00:35:16,440
The two don't.
The two don't correlate, right?

602
00:35:16,440 --> 00:35:19,560
It doesn't correlate.
That says I could go look at

603
00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:23,280
them again, but it does give me
the devices, but it doesn't

604
00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:27,600
correlate that that that device
is listening this percentage on

605
00:35:27,600 --> 00:35:30,600
the web player, right?
It just says the device type.

606
00:35:30,880 --> 00:35:33,600
That makes sense to me.
And Billy, I think even said it

607
00:35:33,600 --> 00:35:35,960
in his first response to all
this.

608
00:35:36,480 --> 00:35:38,800
It it might be different for
different people.

609
00:35:38,800 --> 00:35:41,880
And I think that that's the
whole point here is Sid, I think

610
00:35:41,880 --> 00:35:45,080
did the smart thing by first
looking at all the different

611
00:35:45,080 --> 00:35:47,720
analytics and trying to piece
the puzzle together.

612
00:35:48,000 --> 00:35:52,400
And in this case, yeah, his
website, the Buzz Sprout

613
00:35:52,400 --> 00:35:56,480
embedded player, these things
are getting a lot of people to

614
00:35:56,480 --> 00:35:58,440
press play.
These are the places people are

615
00:35:58,440 --> 00:36:01,880
going to listen to his podcast.
And I think a lot of that has to

616
00:36:01,880 --> 00:36:05,520
do with we have a very active
e-mail list or I must say

617
00:36:05,520 --> 00:36:08,200
engaged e-mail list.
We have about 450 people on our

618
00:36:08,200 --> 00:36:09,960
e-mail list.
A couple of years ago, I

619
00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:14,160
scrubbed the e-mail list and it
had like 2000 people and then I

620
00:36:14,160 --> 00:36:18,200
scrubbed it down to only people
that were engaged with us or

621
00:36:18,200 --> 00:36:20,080
open something.
If they hadn't opened or clicked

622
00:36:20,080 --> 00:36:22,120
on anything in like 3 months, I
took them off the e-mail list,

623
00:36:22,120 --> 00:36:24,680
which is not what a lot of
people tell you to do, but I did

624
00:36:24,680 --> 00:36:28,480
it.
And but now I get between, I get

625
00:36:28,480 --> 00:36:34,280
around a 50% open rate and
between a three and 6% click

626
00:36:34,280 --> 00:36:37,520
rate and clicking the link and I
send an e-mail every other week

627
00:36:37,520 --> 00:36:39,560
on Tuesday at 9:15 in the
morning.

628
00:36:39,880 --> 00:36:42,800
It's about the podcast.
It has a link to the landing

629
00:36:42,800 --> 00:36:46,680
page, and every Tuesday we see a
bump in downloads and I think

630
00:36:46,680 --> 00:36:49,840
that group that's on our e-mail
list is actually who's clicking

631
00:36:50,280 --> 00:36:52,840
the link and listening to the
player.

632
00:36:52,840 --> 00:36:56,280
So I think there's some
correlation there to having an

633
00:36:56,280 --> 00:36:59,480
engaged group in our e-mail list
that is clicking that linked.

634
00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:05,800
Also interesting and applaud
you, Sid, for really digging

635
00:37:05,800 --> 00:37:08,720
into all the different areas to
try to get to the bottom of

636
00:37:08,720 --> 00:37:10,640
this.
And I think this is a good first

637
00:37:10,640 --> 00:37:13,400
move.
I obviously it came from me, so

638
00:37:13,400 --> 00:37:16,040
I'm giving, I guess I'm giving
myself a pat on the back, but I

639
00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:20,000
think adjusting the web page is
really about a valuable thing

640
00:37:20,000 --> 00:37:23,320
for you to do and then
experiment with, right?

641
00:37:23,320 --> 00:37:25,680
Like we got to see, does this
really move the needle?

642
00:37:25,680 --> 00:37:29,320
Does this make a difference?
And we shall see.

643
00:37:29,320 --> 00:37:31,640
To be continued.
But we have Renee on stage, so

644
00:37:31,640 --> 00:37:34,360
let's check in with her.
Good morning to you, Renee.

645
00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:35,640
What did you want to add to all
this?

646
00:37:36,480 --> 00:37:38,360
Good morning.
I have three thoughts on this

647
00:37:38,360 --> 00:37:41,600
and I come to this truly as a
marketer or not as a podcaster.

648
00:37:41,600 --> 00:37:44,520
So the first thing I would do is
I would want to see what's

649
00:37:44,520 --> 00:37:46,440
happening on mobile compared to
desktop.

650
00:37:46,440 --> 00:37:48,360
And that's going to determine
also, you know, where the

651
00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:50,720
placement of things are, what
are they seeing on a mobile

652
00:37:51,000 --> 00:37:53,760
compared to a desktop and who's
coming over, who's leaving.

653
00:37:53,760 --> 00:37:57,440
So that's going to be a
determinant #2 the next thing

654
00:37:57,440 --> 00:38:00,720
that I want to do immediately is
I want to go look at the

655
00:38:00,720 --> 00:38:03,200
metadata.
I want to look at the meta title

656
00:38:03,200 --> 00:38:06,080
and the meta description,
because that is what's bringing

657
00:38:06,080 --> 00:38:09,800
people over from search, right?
So if I go look at that, is

658
00:38:09,800 --> 00:38:13,520
there a disconnect and I am
being brought over to episode

659
00:38:13,520 --> 00:38:17,080
163?
When I look at the meta title on

660
00:38:17,080 --> 00:38:20,520
both of them, just say the Trend
Report podcast episode 163 or

661
00:38:20,520 --> 00:38:22,280
164.
But when I go to the

662
00:38:22,280 --> 00:38:26,600
description, I see the words
office furniture industry.

663
00:38:26,600 --> 00:38:30,240
When I land on the page, I'm not
seeing that above the folder

664
00:38:30,240 --> 00:38:33,120
anywhere.
I've got to go down somewhere.

665
00:38:33,120 --> 00:38:37,600
I'm assuming I saw it in 164.
I saw furniture sales at the

666
00:38:37,600 --> 00:38:40,080
top.
So it could be people are coming

667
00:38:40,080 --> 00:38:42,640
in on a furniture industry
search.

668
00:38:42,920 --> 00:38:46,160
They land on this and at the top
they're going to see thought

669
00:38:46,160 --> 00:38:48,480
leadership age.
I don't know who this person is.

670
00:38:48,480 --> 00:38:51,840
I think this is a disconnect.
I just sent me to the wrong

671
00:38:51,840 --> 00:38:54,480
place.
So if you're bringing them in on

672
00:38:54,520 --> 00:38:57,320
a search, you got to make sure
that those keywords are showing

673
00:38:57,320 --> 00:39:00,080
up at the top.
So the person says I've landed

674
00:39:00,080 --> 00:39:01,840
at the right place.
That could be it.

675
00:39:01,840 --> 00:39:04,480
So how do we find out how
they're coming?

676
00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:08,000
You go to your Google Search
Console data and you're going to

677
00:39:08,000 --> 00:39:11,360
see what searches are happening
to that page and you're going to

678
00:39:11,360 --> 00:39:14,040
see what keywords they're
they're coming in AT.

679
00:39:14,040 --> 00:39:17,560
And if they're coming in with a
lot of furniture things and

680
00:39:17,560 --> 00:39:19,640
you're not having furniture
there, that would be a connect.

681
00:39:19,640 --> 00:39:22,480
But without more data, I can't
really, you know, do any more

682
00:39:22,480 --> 00:39:24,440
surgery.
But those are the things that I

683
00:39:24,440 --> 00:39:28,120
look for when I'm trying to find
why did I get either all these

684
00:39:28,120 --> 00:39:31,960
impressions, all these people
that actually hit my page and

685
00:39:31,960 --> 00:39:34,840
why didn't they convert in in
any type of action.

686
00:39:34,880 --> 00:39:37,120
So those are just the beginning
things I would start looking

687
00:39:37,120 --> 00:39:39,640
for.
So, Renee, those are brilliant

688
00:39:39,640 --> 00:39:41,200
points.
And I hadn't even thought about

689
00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:43,240
metadata.
I mean, this is not my area of

690
00:39:43,240 --> 00:39:46,760
expertise, let's be clear.
But it's a great point to go and

691
00:39:46,760 --> 00:39:49,440
investigate that and to look at
it, see where they're coming

692
00:39:49,440 --> 00:39:51,040
from.
We I did go look at where the

693
00:39:51,040 --> 00:39:53,800
sources were.
I don't remember exactly what it

694
00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:56,200
said, but I mean, this is all on
Mondays.

695
00:39:56,200 --> 00:40:00,800
This is all very fresh, but it's
timely for me as I look at what

696
00:40:00,800 --> 00:40:05,680
I'm going to do for Season 7 of
the podcast over the next few

697
00:40:05,680 --> 00:40:08,720
months as I.
Get ready to reinvent it, which

698
00:40:08,720 --> 00:40:13,640
may include a name change, a
rebranding of the podcast for

699
00:40:13,640 --> 00:40:18,000
something that you just directly
said, which is that, excuse me,

700
00:40:18,000 --> 00:40:20,400
the name of my show has nothing
to do with the office furniture

701
00:40:20,400 --> 00:40:23,840
industry and which is the long
story behind it.

702
00:40:23,840 --> 00:40:26,720
But there's some, I'm having
some conversations with people

703
00:40:26,720 --> 00:40:31,520
in my circle about what I can do
to uplift the podcast, to keep

704
00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:35,440
it growing, to do things that
makes it all tied together and

705
00:40:35,440 --> 00:40:38,560
tied in better to the industry
that I support.

706
00:40:38,560 --> 00:40:41,480
So all these points are well
taken, so thank you very much.

707
00:40:42,200 --> 00:40:44,920
Thank you, Sid.
And yes, I echo what you said.

708
00:40:44,920 --> 00:40:46,760
These were awesome points,
Renee.

709
00:40:46,760 --> 00:40:48,520
Thank you.
I think that these are important

710
00:40:48,520 --> 00:40:52,440
areas to think about.
And to Sid's point, a lot of us

711
00:40:52,440 --> 00:40:56,160
as podcasters, this isn't our
area of expertise.

712
00:40:56,160 --> 00:41:00,760
We didn't go into podcasting to
understand metadata, keywords,

713
00:41:01,240 --> 00:41:05,600
SEOAI, etcetera, right?
We, we got into it because we

714
00:41:05,600 --> 00:41:08,680
wanted to ultimately share a
message, grow a business, grow a

715
00:41:08,680 --> 00:41:10,800
following, whatever your reasons
are.

716
00:41:11,160 --> 00:41:16,040
But usually it's not that it's
not to learn SEO and metadata.

717
00:41:16,920 --> 00:41:20,400
So that's why we talk about it
here, Sid, this change.

718
00:41:20,400 --> 00:41:23,640
So it's basically you're
thinking about changing the

719
00:41:23,640 --> 00:41:26,520
podcast but not the target
audience.

720
00:41:26,520 --> 00:41:28,320
Is that fair to say?
Correct.

721
00:41:28,320 --> 00:41:31,080
I'm not changing the audience.
I'm not leaving the community

722
00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:34,160
that I'm so well known in and
that, you know, people come to

723
00:41:34,160 --> 00:41:35,760
me for.
And so no, I'm not changing

724
00:41:35,760 --> 00:41:38,120
that.
I'm just looking at potentially

725
00:41:38,120 --> 00:41:40,880
rebranding that might help the
reach of the show.

726
00:41:40,880 --> 00:41:45,480
I'm thinking about, you know,
different formats to redo the

727
00:41:45,480 --> 00:41:49,040
show and adding segments to it.
I'm thinking about guests.

728
00:41:49,040 --> 00:41:52,120
I mean, I've been surveying to
my listeners.

729
00:41:52,120 --> 00:41:56,200
I put a call out to my listeners
to, you know, give me feedback.

730
00:41:56,200 --> 00:41:59,160
I had a survey form as well as a
link to schedule a call with me.

731
00:41:59,160 --> 00:42:02,760
I probably had 25 calls with
listeners and I have a series of

732
00:42:02,760 --> 00:42:06,000
five questions that Alex and
Filippo shared in a webinar that

733
00:42:06,000 --> 00:42:09,320
I was in to ask my listener.
So I've been over the last

734
00:42:09,320 --> 00:42:12,640
several months, like knowing I
wanted to make some changes that

735
00:42:12,640 --> 00:42:16,920
would have hopefully really big
positive impacts in 2026.

736
00:42:16,920 --> 00:42:19,640
So I've been diving in and
talking to the people that

737
00:42:19,640 --> 00:42:23,200
listen on a regular basis and
really trying to figure out what

738
00:42:23,200 --> 00:42:26,920
to do when we launched our first
episode of the season 7, which

739
00:42:26,920 --> 00:42:28,880
will be the first Monday of
February.

740
00:42:29,160 --> 00:42:34,600
So we take we take December and
January off and then that's when

741
00:42:34,600 --> 00:42:36,160
I'm recording and things of that
nature.

742
00:42:36,160 --> 00:42:39,960
So between now and December,
I'll figure out exactly the

743
00:42:39,960 --> 00:42:42,560
direction I want to go and what
I want to do differently to make

744
00:42:42,560 --> 00:42:45,640
the show more engaging and, you
know, better guess better

745
00:42:45,640 --> 00:42:48,120
topics, things of that nature,
maybe the rebrand and that kind

746
00:42:48,120 --> 00:42:49,920
of stuff.
So that hopefully we get

747
00:42:49,920 --> 00:42:53,480
ourselves set up for a really
great season 7, which would

748
00:42:53,480 --> 00:42:56,000
include, I've not had sponsors
for a couple years, so which

749
00:42:56,000 --> 00:42:57,520
would include going back to
sponsors.

750
00:42:57,520 --> 00:43:01,040
I've got a list of people I want
to reach out to about sponsoring

751
00:43:01,040 --> 00:43:03,200
and I'm thinking about how to
incorporate them into the show.

752
00:43:03,200 --> 00:43:07,480
So I'm I'm really rethinking the
whole thing in order to help

753
00:43:07,480 --> 00:43:11,560
fuel the growth for next year.
Interesting.

754
00:43:11,560 --> 00:43:16,200
So this is a good segue then to
get to at least one mailbag

755
00:43:16,200 --> 00:43:19,800
question that we had intent.
That was our intention to do for

756
00:43:19,800 --> 00:43:21,440
today.
So let's dig into it.

757
00:43:21,440 --> 00:43:26,240
This comes from the host of a
podcast called Bring Joy

758
00:43:26,320 --> 00:43:30,320
Podcast, and it says I'm
planning on changing the format

759
00:43:30,320 --> 00:43:33,440
of my podcast and trying to
decide if I need to start an

760
00:43:33,440 --> 00:43:38,400
entirely new one or do I just
change my intro and logo and

761
00:43:38,400 --> 00:43:42,160
keep the same podcast name?
Any suggestions?

762
00:43:42,160 --> 00:43:45,880
I don't want to lose my existing
episodes or audience or

763
00:43:45,880 --> 00:43:48,680
necessarily pay for another
podcast.

764
00:43:48,920 --> 00:43:52,000
What do you think?
So I want to talk a little bit

765
00:43:52,000 --> 00:43:57,880
about when we are rebranding or
restarting, right, Starting from

766
00:43:57,880 --> 00:44:01,560
fresh.
So how can podcasters decide

767
00:44:01,560 --> 00:44:05,640
whether a new idea fits under
the current brand?

768
00:44:05,640 --> 00:44:09,080
Similarly to Sid, although he
said he's also playing around

769
00:44:09,080 --> 00:44:12,120
with formats.
But how can a podcaster decide

770
00:44:12,120 --> 00:44:15,640
whether the new idea fits under
the current brand or it deserves

771
00:44:15,640 --> 00:44:18,800
its own show?
I mean, I am not changing.

772
00:44:19,160 --> 00:44:22,600
The overall content of my show
is not changing, right.

773
00:44:22,960 --> 00:44:26,520
I am potentially looking at the
structure of the show and things

774
00:44:26,520 --> 00:44:28,440
of that nature, the branding of
the show.

775
00:44:28,760 --> 00:44:30,720
I'm not changing the content.
We're still going to have real

776
00:44:30,720 --> 00:44:32,920
conversation with real people
and talk all things office

777
00:44:32,920 --> 00:44:35,040
furniture.
That's not changing, right?

778
00:44:35,040 --> 00:44:38,720
So I'm not going to be talking
about, you know, chickens, for

779
00:44:38,720 --> 00:44:40,200
example.
Sorry Amanda sourcing thing in

780
00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:42,240
my mind, I'm not going to be
talking about chickens on my

781
00:44:42,240 --> 00:44:44,720
show.
So you know that that's not

782
00:44:44,720 --> 00:44:47,840
changing.
So for me, abandoning the RSS

783
00:44:47,840 --> 00:44:51,200
feed is really bad idea because
of the people that are following

784
00:44:51,200 --> 00:44:54,080
the RSS feed.
I wanted to keep that.

785
00:44:54,080 --> 00:44:57,520
So if I do rebrand and change it
to a new name, I would stay

786
00:44:57,520 --> 00:44:59,400
there.
I would just do the rebranding.

787
00:44:59,400 --> 00:45:02,720
And I even yesterday made some
notes about what are ways that

788
00:45:02,720 --> 00:45:06,000
we could trickle out some
excitement around new things

789
00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:09,480
coming and maybe show little
aspects on social media of the

790
00:45:09,480 --> 00:45:11,800
new branding.
Maybe a little clip of something

791
00:45:11,800 --> 00:45:15,880
here there to tease the new, the
new structure, the new brand

792
00:45:15,880 --> 00:45:17,720
coming out, if that's what we
decide to do.

793
00:45:17,720 --> 00:45:21,360
So for me, I am not going to
abandon the the RSS feed in the

794
00:45:21,360 --> 00:45:24,480
followers that I already have
there because I think that's

795
00:45:24,480 --> 00:45:26,240
like really starting from
scratch.

796
00:45:26,240 --> 00:45:29,240
If I start a new show about
chickens, then I would have a

797
00:45:29,240 --> 00:45:33,360
total new RSS feed, a total new
landing page and everything.

798
00:45:33,360 --> 00:45:34,760
I would not act the two
together.

799
00:45:35,480 --> 00:45:38,200
And now I'm curious if there is
a podcast about chickens, which

800
00:45:38,200 --> 00:45:41,280
there's got to be, right?
And the reason why I Sid is

801
00:45:41,280 --> 00:45:45,120
using that as an example and
apologized to Amanda is because

802
00:45:45,120 --> 00:45:48,680
Amanda's been sharing her
journey with her flock of

803
00:45:48,760 --> 00:45:49,920
chickens.
What's the right way?

804
00:45:49,920 --> 00:45:51,760
What do you call a group of
chickens?

805
00:45:51,760 --> 00:45:54,320
Amanda A.
Flat or my babies?

806
00:45:54,600 --> 00:45:56,480
Or your babies.
Yes, that is true.

807
00:45:56,480 --> 00:45:58,400
I see that all the time.
On your content.

808
00:45:58,400 --> 00:46:00,560
Yes.
Amanda's babies, yes.

809
00:46:01,040 --> 00:46:03,120
So go yeah.
Again, go check out Amanda's

810
00:46:03,120 --> 00:46:08,080
content if you're curious.
And OK, so I, I respect that

811
00:46:08,080 --> 00:46:10,400
Sid.
And in this case with this

812
00:46:10,400 --> 00:46:14,600
mailbag question, this person is
thinking about a potentially

813
00:46:14,600 --> 00:46:18,080
complete overhaul.
And I'm going to, I want to go

814
00:46:18,080 --> 00:46:21,000
to Chris for a second.
Chris, if you are free and

815
00:46:21,000 --> 00:46:23,720
available because you are a
marketing guy, you help people

816
00:46:23,720 --> 00:46:25,440
with their marketing and
branding.

817
00:46:25,920 --> 00:46:31,200
So what does a podcaster have to
consider or how do they consider

818
00:46:31,680 --> 00:46:36,160
whether they can shift to this
new idea under their current

819
00:46:36,160 --> 00:46:39,640
brand, or maybe move into a
completely new brand?

820
00:46:40,040 --> 00:46:43,120
That is a really good question.
I mean, I think that once again,

821
00:46:43,120 --> 00:46:45,280
you have to look at your actual
audience, right?

822
00:46:45,280 --> 00:46:47,520
I mean, that's the ultimate
algorithm, right?

823
00:46:47,520 --> 00:46:50,800
The community, the audience.
And if it's something that you

824
00:46:50,800 --> 00:46:54,600
feel like the back current
audience is going to like, then

825
00:46:54,760 --> 00:46:56,760
I don't see why you wouldn't
keep it under that brand.

826
00:46:56,760 --> 00:46:58,720
But I mean if you wanted to be a
completely.

827
00:46:58,720 --> 00:47:01,920
New thing all together and you
could go after the same

828
00:47:01,920 --> 00:47:04,640
audience.
But you know, I think it really

829
00:47:04,640 --> 00:47:07,640
that's how I would weigh it at
first is like, what is the is

830
00:47:07,640 --> 00:47:08,760
it?
Is it something that that

831
00:47:08,760 --> 00:47:11,400
community that I currently have
is actually going to like?

832
00:47:11,800 --> 00:47:15,200
And it's not to say too that you
couldn't spin it off into its

833
00:47:15,200 --> 00:47:16,480
own thing after a little bit,
right.

834
00:47:16,480 --> 00:47:18,800
So maybe you could do it under
the current brand, but then

835
00:47:18,800 --> 00:47:20,480
eventually say, hey, you know
what?

836
00:47:20,480 --> 00:47:22,960
And let the audience know that
this is something that's going

837
00:47:22,960 --> 00:47:27,200
to be becoming its own separate
thing over here, you know, as

838
00:47:27,200 --> 00:47:29,440
you go on.
But if you're going to go after

839
00:47:29,440 --> 00:47:33,360
a completely new audience all
together and then, yeah, I think

840
00:47:33,360 --> 00:47:37,840
then doing a new podcast under a
different brand would probably

841
00:47:37,840 --> 00:47:42,480
make sense from that standpoint
if it's you as the person.

842
00:47:42,520 --> 00:47:45,720
I mean, Chris Baglio has like 3
different podcasts I do, right?

843
00:47:45,760 --> 00:47:48,960
But like, I'm not changing.
I change the name of the show

844
00:47:48,960 --> 00:47:51,080
because it's a slightly
different audience for each

845
00:47:51,080 --> 00:47:54,960
thing, but I'm not changing my
actual like, you know, name my

846
00:47:54,960 --> 00:47:56,600
company or anything like that,
you know?

847
00:47:57,280 --> 00:48:00,280
Yeah, absolutely.
I appreciate that and I like

848
00:48:00,400 --> 00:48:03,280
something that you're saying
there as far as, you know,

849
00:48:03,280 --> 00:48:05,600
thinking about your audience,
for one, I think that's that

850
00:48:05,600 --> 00:48:08,640
could be argued as the number
one thing to consider if you're

851
00:48:08,640 --> 00:48:11,720
going to change a name, change
the format, etcetera.

852
00:48:12,120 --> 00:48:17,120
And I like the idea of phasing
in the new format to your

853
00:48:17,120 --> 00:48:19,560
existing content.
So how do you do that?

854
00:48:19,760 --> 00:48:22,920
I would suggest maybe you once a
month.

855
00:48:22,920 --> 00:48:26,520
If you do say a weekly show,
once a month, you bring in that

856
00:48:26,520 --> 00:48:30,320
new format if you feel like it's
aligned or aligned enough with

857
00:48:30,320 --> 00:48:33,040
your audience.
Phase it in every so often and

858
00:48:33,040 --> 00:48:35,120
once a month.
Like I said, once twice a month.

859
00:48:35,440 --> 00:48:39,200
See how your audience responds
to it and ask them for the

860
00:48:39,200 --> 00:48:42,080
feedback.
Hey everybody, I'm breaking

861
00:48:42,080 --> 00:48:45,720
format today and I'm curious
what you think.

862
00:48:45,720 --> 00:48:48,480
Please give it a listen, enjoy
the show and send me your

863
00:48:48,480 --> 00:48:52,040
feedback that you could learn a
lot from that before making that

864
00:48:52,040 --> 00:48:55,440
giant leap.
And that I think can help you

865
00:48:56,040 --> 00:48:59,760
make that decision whether it
can stay part of the show that

866
00:48:59,760 --> 00:49:02,200
you've been doing even if you
make a name change, but you're

867
00:49:02,200 --> 00:49:04,120
going to keep your RSS feed,
etcetera.

868
00:49:04,360 --> 00:49:06,640
I think I think it's a good way
to test.

869
00:49:07,560 --> 00:49:10,320
I'm going to go to Renee.
And then I do have A1 clip to

870
00:49:10,320 --> 00:49:14,160
leave you with on this topic
that I think is very relevant.

871
00:49:14,160 --> 00:49:16,720
So stay with us.
And Renee, what did you want to

872
00:49:16,720 --> 00:49:18,560
add?
Three quick little things and

873
00:49:18,560 --> 00:49:20,480
this is going to be a show my
age.

874
00:49:20,760 --> 00:49:24,720
How did we do that in the days
of television sitcoms?

875
00:49:24,720 --> 00:49:28,800
We would have Laverne and
Shirley show up on Happy Days

876
00:49:28,800 --> 00:49:31,080
and find out that, you know,
that made it spikes.

877
00:49:31,080 --> 00:49:33,640
So only my older friends in this
group know what I'm talking

878
00:49:33,640 --> 00:49:35,600
about.
Hey, I'm going to cut you off

879
00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:38,600
real quick.
I just commented on a TikTok.

880
00:49:38,600 --> 00:49:42,680
It was something like tell me
you're from the child of the 80s

881
00:49:42,680 --> 00:49:46,000
without saying it and or you
know, some whatever those terms

882
00:49:46,000 --> 00:49:49,200
go.
And I said Mork from Ork made

883
00:49:49,200 --> 00:49:51,760
his first his debut on Happy
Days.

884
00:49:52,720 --> 00:49:54,760
Right now I'm showing my age
with you.

885
00:49:54,800 --> 00:49:58,160
Yes, exactly.
So that was my one thought.

886
00:49:58,160 --> 00:50:01,760
My other thought was don't
forget to go to Google Trends to

887
00:50:01,760 --> 00:50:04,560
see what conversations are
happening out there.

888
00:50:04,880 --> 00:50:08,280
And also go to Reddit, do all
the things and use chat to help

889
00:50:08,280 --> 00:50:10,320
you figure out is this a
trending topic.

890
00:50:10,320 --> 00:50:12,800
So if you don't go to Google
Trends, I know you've talked

891
00:50:12,800 --> 00:50:15,760
about it before in this group
trends.google.com.

892
00:50:16,000 --> 00:50:20,080
Go put in conversations,
different keywords and see see

893
00:50:20,080 --> 00:50:23,600
what's happening out there.
And then my final thought was if

894
00:50:23,600 --> 00:50:26,680
you were taking, I'm sure you've
talked about this before, but if

895
00:50:26,680 --> 00:50:30,680
you are taking a podcast and
you're rebranding it, you can do

896
00:50:30,680 --> 00:50:33,640
that on the same platform, on
the same website.

897
00:50:33,720 --> 00:50:37,960
You just have to do redirects.
And that's where a website

898
00:50:37,960 --> 00:50:42,160
expert comes in and an SEO
expert, specifically website

899
00:50:42,160 --> 00:50:47,600
person that knows how to do
successfully mutate one URL into

900
00:50:47,600 --> 00:50:51,560
another URL without losing
traffic or significant traffic.

901
00:50:51,560 --> 00:50:54,160
You may get a little bit of a
dip, but there is a way to do

902
00:50:54,160 --> 00:50:56,200
that setting up like a third
website.

903
00:50:56,200 --> 00:50:58,280
This is not my department.
This is my business partners

904
00:50:58,280 --> 00:50:59,920
department.
But I hear him talk about it all

905
00:50:59,920 --> 00:51:04,920
the time and it can be done.
So rebranding can happen on the

906
00:51:04,920 --> 00:51:07,480
same podcast if you do all the
other things that have been

907
00:51:07,480 --> 00:51:10,200
discussed here right now.
Thank you, Renee.

908
00:51:10,760 --> 00:51:14,480
I think Renee gets the Gold Star
of the morning offering some

909
00:51:14,520 --> 00:51:17,240
really valuable stuff.
Not that the others haven't, but

910
00:51:17,240 --> 00:51:19,120
thank you, Renee.
I really appreciate what you're

911
00:51:19,120 --> 00:51:22,680
digging into here.
And I want to the the one thing

912
00:51:22,680 --> 00:51:27,560
that I heard just recently on
one of my favorite podcasts and

913
00:51:27,560 --> 00:51:30,760
one of my favorite content
creators, Heather parody on her

914
00:51:30,760 --> 00:51:37,760
show unconventional leaders.
She had the big YouTube Jenny

915
00:51:37,760 --> 00:51:44,400
Hoyos on and talking about you
and your character as a podcast

916
00:51:44,400 --> 00:51:45,560
host.
Listen to this.

917
00:51:45,560 --> 00:51:48,680
And then I want to get somebody,
somebody's reaction to it.

918
00:51:48,680 --> 00:51:50,920
I'm curious what you think.
Something that's not talked

919
00:51:50,920 --> 00:51:54,440
about enough is our character.
We want to basically have an

920
00:51:54,440 --> 00:51:56,920
exaggerated verse version of who
we are.

921
00:51:57,200 --> 00:52:00,120
Like if you were to stereotype
yourself and like you know how

922
00:52:00,320 --> 00:52:03,120
caricatures are drawings with
you, but they exaggerate your

923
00:52:03,120 --> 00:52:05,200
features.
Yes, that's what you want to do

924
00:52:05,200 --> 00:52:07,080
to your personality.
You, you probably have so many

925
00:52:07,080 --> 00:52:09,360
different things you're
interested in, but like if

926
00:52:09,360 --> 00:52:11,680
someone were to mock you, what
would they do?

927
00:52:11,680 --> 00:52:12,920
And that's what you want to play
up.

928
00:52:13,120 --> 00:52:15,800
And that's why my mom and I have
a character that stays

929
00:52:15,800 --> 00:52:17,840
consistent.
And the reason I think character

930
00:52:17,840 --> 00:52:21,200
is so important is because I
used to start in a niche because

931
00:52:21,200 --> 00:52:23,000
that's what grows the fastest.
Start in a niche.

932
00:52:23,360 --> 00:52:25,720
But if you want to branch out,
you're going to lose your

933
00:52:25,720 --> 00:52:28,600
viewers because maybe they were
only watching for the finance,

934
00:52:28,920 --> 00:52:32,560
but if you make them invested in
you as a character, everything

935
00:52:32,560 --> 00:52:34,320
can change.
But if your character stays the

936
00:52:34,320 --> 00:52:35,760
same, they're still going to
keep watching.

937
00:52:36,440 --> 00:52:39,960
I see a lot of the emoji
reactions on stage and in the

938
00:52:39,960 --> 00:52:42,880
audience.
It seems like everybody agrees

939
00:52:42,880 --> 00:52:45,880
with that statement.
And I think it's at the very

940
00:52:45,880 --> 00:52:49,720
least somebody needs to hear it
today for so many different

941
00:52:49,720 --> 00:52:53,560
reasons, right?
It's proof that authenticity is

942
00:52:53,560 --> 00:52:58,920
key and that we don't have to
put on a podcaster face per SE

943
00:52:59,000 --> 00:53:03,920
to make it a successful podcast
and to really grow a following,

944
00:53:03,920 --> 00:53:06,440
grow an audience, grow super
fans.

945
00:53:06,600 --> 00:53:09,880
It's injecting ourselves into
our podcast.

946
00:53:10,120 --> 00:53:13,520
It's, I want to say I, this
doesn't feel right to say it

947
00:53:13,520 --> 00:53:14,760
this way, but I can't think of a
better way.

948
00:53:14,760 --> 00:53:20,960
It's why I share with you things
like my ADHD journey and the

949
00:53:20,960 --> 00:53:24,160
fact that I had to get off the
meds and I've shared over time

950
00:53:24,400 --> 00:53:27,320
the struggles and the victories,
right?

951
00:53:27,320 --> 00:53:29,640
Like got off it and my blood
pressure's better.

952
00:53:29,640 --> 00:53:31,040
I've shared all these things
with you.

953
00:53:31,160 --> 00:53:35,040
Has nothing to do with
podcasting, but injecting who we

954
00:53:35,040 --> 00:53:40,320
are into our podcast creates
longevity for whatever we do.

955
00:53:41,000 --> 00:53:44,960
If we want to change our
podcast, I believe at the very

956
00:53:44,960 --> 00:53:48,680
least you're going to bring a
big chunk of that audience over

957
00:53:48,680 --> 00:53:53,960
with you if you're sharing your
personality with them, if you're

958
00:53:53,960 --> 00:53:57,240
sharing your interests, your
likes, etcetera, with them.

959
00:53:57,680 --> 00:54:00,840
Now, if they stay, that's
another story, right?

960
00:54:00,840 --> 00:54:05,880
Because maybe the content just
isn't their cup of tea, but

961
00:54:05,880 --> 00:54:10,680
you're going to bring them with
you if you're sharing more about

962
00:54:10,680 --> 00:54:13,080
who you are and what makes you
tick.

963
00:54:13,600 --> 00:54:15,440
Does anyone else want to add
anything to that?

964
00:54:15,680 --> 00:54:18,720
I have to go back on the replay
and listen to that clip again

965
00:54:18,760 --> 00:54:21,720
because I took it completely
different.

966
00:54:22,600 --> 00:54:25,920
The guest was talking about not
showing her real self.

967
00:54:25,920 --> 00:54:29,120
The guest was talking about
showing a caricature.

968
00:54:29,480 --> 00:54:33,080
Of herself.
And the first thing I thought of

969
00:54:33,080 --> 00:54:36,000
when she said that was, oh,
going against the grain.

970
00:54:36,000 --> 00:54:38,800
When everyone says authenticity,
going against the grain.

971
00:54:38,800 --> 00:54:41,400
That's interesting.
So I think I need to go back and

972
00:54:41,400 --> 00:54:44,520
listen to that clip because I
did not get what you're talking.

973
00:54:44,520 --> 00:54:48,520
About that's a fairpoint and it
sounds like basically it because

974
00:54:48,520 --> 00:54:51,920
the rest of what she said didn't
quite align with the idea of

975
00:54:51,920 --> 00:54:56,640
caricature, right?
So she, she used that to set up

976
00:54:56,640 --> 00:54:59,560
what she was going to say.
But really the way I interpreted

977
00:54:59,560 --> 00:55:02,640
it, listening to the rest of
what she shared, I interpreted

978
00:55:02,640 --> 00:55:07,320
it as really bring out the
certain things about yourself.

979
00:55:07,320 --> 00:55:10,720
Share if you've got like,
another example is I'll share

980
00:55:10,720 --> 00:55:13,280
from time to time my love for
Star Wars, right?

981
00:55:13,480 --> 00:55:16,040
So I'll share little things
about it or I might quote

982
00:55:16,040 --> 00:55:19,320
something from it, etcetera.
Like I think that's what she

983
00:55:19,320 --> 00:55:22,720
means by caricature because
you're you're becoming bigger

984
00:55:22,720 --> 00:55:26,000
than just the podcast.
When she mentioned it, when

985
00:55:26,000 --> 00:55:29,600
someone writes a caricature of
you, that was really interesting

986
00:55:29,600 --> 00:55:33,960
to me, because if someone were
to write a caricature of you,

987
00:55:33,960 --> 00:55:37,240
Mark, they might, they, they
might put you, you know, with

988
00:55:37,240 --> 00:55:42,240
the lightsaber in your, in your
hand, you know, so all of that

989
00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:46,560
still applies your interests
that people don't know about

990
00:55:46,560 --> 00:55:51,720
you, that would still apply.
But that whole exaggerated

991
00:55:51,760 --> 00:55:54,400
caricature statement was
interesting to me.

992
00:55:54,600 --> 00:55:55,880
Yeah, that's fair.
OK.

993
00:55:55,880 --> 00:55:59,280
I'm going to go to Amanda and
then I'm going to go down the

994
00:55:59,280 --> 00:56:01,080
line.
We'll try to do this as quickly

995
00:56:01,080 --> 00:56:03,120
as we can before we wrap up.
Go ahead, Amanda.

996
00:56:03,800 --> 00:56:05,640
I just thought it was
interesting that they chose to

997
00:56:05,640 --> 00:56:10,160
use the word like caricature
because I feel like my, my whole

998
00:56:10,160 --> 00:56:14,480
like online presence is me being
that, you know, I'm genuinely

999
00:56:14,480 --> 00:56:17,800
who I am, but I'm like, I, I
could be wrapped up as that

1000
00:56:17,800 --> 00:56:19,960
everything.
Am I laying in my backyard

1001
00:56:19,960 --> 00:56:21,760
talking to my chickens?
Yes.

1002
00:56:22,120 --> 00:56:26,120
Am I skipping down Lewis Ave.
100% yes.

1003
00:56:26,200 --> 00:56:28,080
It's funny.
Like, that's a great way to kind

1004
00:56:28,080 --> 00:56:31,040
of describe how I show up on my
social media.

1005
00:56:31,560 --> 00:56:34,040
Yeah.
And really fascinating just how

1006
00:56:34,040 --> 00:56:36,520
we all interpret that
differently, right?

1007
00:56:36,520 --> 00:56:39,680
Dr. had her interpretation, I
had mine and Amanda, you had

1008
00:56:39,680 --> 00:56:41,560
yours.
And I'm really connecting with

1009
00:56:41,560 --> 00:56:43,960
yours more than myself, More
than what?

1010
00:56:44,080 --> 00:56:45,840
Dr. said.
I'm just connecting with Yeah,

1011
00:56:45,840 --> 00:56:50,760
we, we can really exaggerate
sometimes who we are and the

1012
00:56:50,760 --> 00:56:53,600
things that we love.
Or maybe that's just who we are.

1013
00:56:54,240 --> 00:56:56,040
And either way, I think it
works.

1014
00:56:56,040 --> 00:57:00,080
The idea is, is to sometimes we
have to be a little bigger than

1015
00:57:00,080 --> 00:57:04,280
life to really get that
personality across to an

1016
00:57:04,280 --> 00:57:07,280
audience, in my opinion.
Rez, you wanted to add

1017
00:57:07,280 --> 00:57:08,000
something.
Go ahead.

1018
00:57:08,400 --> 00:57:13,160
That message from the speaker,
Heather, her name was, I don't

1019
00:57:13,160 --> 00:57:16,800
get the message that she's
trying to say, like being an

1020
00:57:16,800 --> 00:57:18,760
authentic.
I think that.

1021
00:57:19,080 --> 00:57:22,440
Embracing your uniqueness, your
own uniqueness is always, you

1022
00:57:22,440 --> 00:57:24,400
know, the the most attractive
thing you can do.

1023
00:57:24,400 --> 00:57:26,240
And I think that's the message
for me that I got.

1024
00:57:26,440 --> 00:57:27,840
Yeah.
I think that's what she's trying

1025
00:57:27,840 --> 00:57:28,880
to say.
Yes.

1026
00:57:28,880 --> 00:57:33,040
It's it's find your uniqueness.
And I'll, I'll, I'll use my

1027
00:57:33,040 --> 00:57:35,280
words and exploit it.
Right.

1028
00:57:35,280 --> 00:57:39,240
Put it out there, share it,
embrace it with your audience.

1029
00:57:39,240 --> 00:57:40,760
Billy, did you want to add
something?

1030
00:57:41,200 --> 00:57:43,560
I think it was creating media.
It's like we're talking about

1031
00:57:43,560 --> 00:57:45,720
energy.
If I just report a video of just

1032
00:57:45,720 --> 00:57:49,880
me in my everyday life, even
though I think I'm very

1033
00:57:49,880 --> 00:57:54,760
entertaining and exciting and
all this in my mind, when I

1034
00:57:54,760 --> 00:57:58,560
watch that video back I go, oh,
I'm that's not really that fun.

1035
00:57:58,680 --> 00:58:04,120
So I have to in my personality,
just exaggerate those things and

1036
00:58:04,200 --> 00:58:09,960
sober expose those things that I
think are funny or punch lines

1037
00:58:09,960 --> 00:58:12,840
or if I'm trying to bring, you
know, I'm not a medium by any

1038
00:58:12,840 --> 00:58:16,960
means who I think I am.
And so I try to bring, you know,

1039
00:58:16,960 --> 00:58:19,160
that stuff in there and I have
to like consciously do that

1040
00:58:19,160 --> 00:58:22,160
because in my mind it's real
loud and you know, it's

1041
00:58:22,320 --> 00:58:25,800
elaborate and it's all this, but
it might just everyday

1042
00:58:25,800 --> 00:58:27,440
personality.
It's really not.

1043
00:58:27,680 --> 00:58:31,560
And but I understand like part
of creating content is

1044
00:58:31,560 --> 00:58:34,280
entertainment no matter what
level you're doing it at like

1045
00:58:34,360 --> 00:58:36,760
when the entertainment business
essentially so.

1046
00:58:37,640 --> 00:58:40,360
You got to have.
That to attract and keep people

1047
00:58:40,480 --> 00:58:43,040
engaged.
Yeah, Thank you, Billy.

1048
00:58:43,840 --> 00:58:48,000
Thank you all for diving into
that and for a really fun show.

1049
00:58:48,200 --> 00:58:52,280
I mean, I feel like we had the
the technical side, we had the

1050
00:58:52,280 --> 00:58:57,600
emotional side, we got into the
the IT side.

1051
00:58:57,600 --> 00:59:01,120
But I feel like this was a well
balanced show and I appreciate

1052
00:59:01,120 --> 00:59:03,400
everybody digging in with me
this morning.

1053
00:59:03,400 --> 00:59:06,400
We're back tomorrow at 7:00 AM
Eastern talking all things

1054
00:59:06,400 --> 00:59:08,000
podcasting.
And of course, because it's

1055
00:59:08,000 --> 00:59:11,760
Friday, we also like to wrap up
our Fridays with sharing our

1056
00:59:11,760 --> 00:59:15,440
wins from the past week.
So come bring yours tomorrow and

1057
00:59:15,440 --> 00:59:18,480
any questions you may have
around podcasting and content

1058
00:59:18,480 --> 00:59:21,680
creation.
So until tomorrow, make it a

1059
00:59:21,680 --> 00:59:23,800
great day everybody take care.